NVIDIA Quadro P2200 vs AMD Radeon R9 Fury

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro P2200 and AMD Radeon R9 Fury videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

NVIDIA Quadro P2200

AMD Radeon R9 Fury

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P2200

Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 11 month(s) later
Around 49% higher boost clock speed: 1493 MHz vs 1000 MHz
533x more texture fill rate: 119.4 GTexel/s vs 224.0 GTexel / s
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 16 nm vs 28 nm
3.7x lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 275 Watt
Around 25% higher maximum memory size: 5 GB vs 4 GB
Around 16% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 920 vs 796
Around 13% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 11437 vs 10116
Around 13% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 11437 vs 10116

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	10 June 2019 vs 10 July 2015
Boost clock speed	1493 MHz vs 1000 MHz
Texture fill rate	119.4 GTexel/s vs 224.0 GTexel / s
Manufacturing process technology	16 nm vs 28 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	75 Watt vs 275 Watt
Maximum memory size	5 GB vs 4 GB
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark	920 vs 796
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	11437 vs 10116
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	11437 vs 10116

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 Fury

2.8x more pipelines: 3584 vs 1280
Around 3% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 9592 vs 9321
Around 71% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 53724 vs 31476
Around 16% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 140.274 vs 121.124
Around 84% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 3595.432 vs 1958.592
Around 55% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 13.082 vs 8.452
Around 10% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 132.701 vs 120.742
Around 55% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 789.536 vs 510.941
2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3356 vs 1676
2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3356 vs 1676
Around 39% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 4739 vs 3404

Specifications (specs)
Pipelines	3584 vs 1280
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	9592 vs 9321
Geekbench - OpenCL	53724 vs 31476
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	140.274 vs 121.124
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	3595.432 vs 1958.592
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	13.082 vs 8.452
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	132.701 vs 120.742
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	789.536 vs 510.941
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3356 vs 1676
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3356 vs 1676
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	4739 vs 3404

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro P2200
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 Fury

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

9321

9592

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

920

796

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

31476

53724

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

121.124

140.274

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1958.592

3595.432

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

8.452

13.082

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

120.742

132.701

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

510.941

789.536

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

11437

10116

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3717

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1676

3356

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

11437

10116

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3717

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1676

3356

3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score

GPU 1

GPU 2

3404

4739

Name	NVIDIA Quadro P2200	AMD Radeon R9 Fury
PassMark - G3D Mark	9321	9592
PassMark - G2D Mark	920	796
Geekbench - OpenCL	31476	53724
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	121.124	140.274
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	1958.592	3595.432
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	8.452	13.082
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	120.742	132.701
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	510.941	789.536
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	11437	10116
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3717	3717
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	1676	3356
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	11437	10116
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3717	3717
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	1676	3356
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	3404	4739

Compare specifications (specs)

	NVIDIA Quadro P2200	AMD Radeon R9 Fury
Essentials
Architecture	Pascal	GCN 3.0
Code name	GP106	Fiji
Launch date	10 June 2019	10 July 2015
Place in performance rating	305	277
Type	Workstation	Desktop
Design		AMD Radeon R9 Fury Series
Launch price (MSRP)		$549
Price now		$399.99
Value for money (0-100)		35.98
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1493 MHz	1000 MHz
Core clock speed	1000 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	16 nm	28 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance	119.4 GFLOPS
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance	59.72 GFLOPS
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance	3.822 TFLOPS
Pipelines	1280	3584
Pixel fill rate	59.72 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate	119.4 GTexel/s	224.0 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	75 Watt	275 Watt
Transistor count	4400 million	8,900 million
Compute units		56
Floating-point performance		7,168 gflops
Stream Processors		3584
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	4x DisplayPort	1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
DisplayPort support
Dual-link DVI support
Eyefinity
HDMI
Number of Eyefinity displays		6
VGA
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Length	201 mm (7.9")
Supplementary power connectors	None	2x 8-pin
Bridgeless CrossFire
Bus support		PCIe 3.0
API support
DirectX	12.0	12
OpenCL	1.2	2.0
OpenGL	4.6	4.5
Shader Model	6.4
Vulkan
Mantle
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	5 GB	4 GB
Memory bandwidth	200.2 GB/s	512 GB/s
Memory bus width	160 bit	4096 bit
Memory type	GDDR5X	High Bandwidth Memory (HBM)
High bandwidth memory (HBM)
Memory clock speed		500 MHz
Shared memory		0
Technologies
AMD Eyefinity
AppAcceleration
CrossFire
DDMA audio
FreeSync
FRTC
HD3D
LiquidVR
PowerTune
TressFX
TrueAudio
Unified Video Decoder (UVD)
Video Code Engine (VCE)
Virtual Super Resolution (VSR)