NVIDIA Quadro P2200 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 730
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro P2200 and NVIDIA GeForce GT 730 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P2200
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 11 month(s) later
- Around 43% higher core clock speed: 1000 MHz vs 700 MHz
- 8274.4x more texture fill rate: 119.4 GTexel/s vs 14.43 GTexel / s
- 3.3x more pipelines: 1280 vs 384
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 16 nm vs 40 nm
- 5x more maximum memory size: 5 GB vs 1 GB
- 11.3x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 9372 vs 830
- 3.5x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 892 vs 253
- 11.1x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 32343 vs 2902
- 11.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 121.124 vs 10.872
- 11.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1958.592 vs 166.832
- 10.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 8.452 vs 0.817
- 9.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 120.742 vs 12.415
- 13.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 510.941 vs 36.916
- 5.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 11437 vs 1951
- 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3717 vs 1693
- 5.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 11437 vs 1951
- 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3717 vs 1693
- 10.4x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 3404 vs 327
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 10 June 2019 vs 18 June 2014 |
Core clock speed | 1000 MHz vs 700 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 119.4 GTexel/s vs 14.43 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 1280 vs 384 |
Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm vs 40 nm |
Maximum memory size | 5 GB vs 1 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 9372 vs 830 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 892 vs 253 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 32343 vs 2902 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 121.124 vs 10.872 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1958.592 vs 166.832 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 8.452 vs 0.817 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 120.742 vs 12.415 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 510.941 vs 36.916 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11437 vs 1951 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 vs 1693 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11437 vs 1951 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 vs 1693 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3404 vs 327 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 730
- Around 53% lower typical power consumption: 49 Watt vs 75 Watt
- Around 98% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3324 vs 1676
- Around 98% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3324 vs 1676
Specifications (specs) | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 49 Watt vs 75 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3324 vs 1676 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3324 vs 1676 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro P2200
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 730
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Quadro P2200 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 730 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 9372 | 830 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 892 | 253 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 32343 | 2902 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 121.124 | 10.872 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1958.592 | 166.832 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 8.452 | 0.817 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 120.742 | 12.415 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 510.941 | 36.916 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11437 | 1951 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 | 1693 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1676 | 3324 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11437 | 1951 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 | 1693 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1676 | 3324 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3404 | 327 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Quadro P2200 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 730 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Pascal | Fermi |
Code name | GP106 | GF108 |
Launch date | 10 June 2019 | 18 June 2014 |
Place in performance rating | 307 | 1311 |
Type | Workstation | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $59.99 | |
Price now | $54.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 20.48 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1493 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 1000 MHz | 700 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm | 40 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 119.4 GFLOPS | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 59.72 GFLOPS | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 3.822 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 1280 | 384 |
Pixel fill rate | 59.72 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 119.4 GTexel/s | 14.43 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 49 Watt |
Transistor count | 4400 million | 585 million |
Floating-point performance | 692.7 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 4x DisplayPort | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 201 mm (7.9") | 145 mm |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenCL | 1.2 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.4 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 5 GB | 1 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 200.2 GB/s | 40.1 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 160 bit | 64 Bit |
Memory type | GDDR5X | GDDR5 |
Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz |