NVIDIA Quadro P2200 versus NVIDIA GeForce GT 730
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA Quadro P2200 and NVIDIA GeForce GT 730 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro P2200
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 4 ans 11 mois plus tard
- Environ 43% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1000 MHz versus 700 MHz
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 119.4 GTexel/s versus 14.43 GTexel / s
- 3.3x plus de pipelines: 1280 versus 384
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 16 nm versus 40 nm
- 5x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 5 GB versus 1 GB
- 11.3x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 9372 versus 830
- 3.5x meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 892 versus 253
- 11.1x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 32343 versus 2902
- 11.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 121.124 versus 10.872
- 11.7x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1958.592 versus 166.832
- 10.3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 8.452 versus 0.817
- 9.7x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 120.742 versus 12.415
- 13.8x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 510.941 versus 36.916
- 5.9x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 11437 versus 1951
- 2.2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3717 versus 1693
- 5.9x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 11437 versus 1951
- 2.2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3717 versus 1693
- 10.4x meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 3404 versus 327
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 10 June 2019 versus 18 June 2014 |
Vitesse du noyau | 1000 MHz versus 700 MHz |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 119.4 GTexel/s versus 14.43 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 1280 versus 384 |
Processus de fabrication | 16 nm versus 40 nm |
Taille de mémore maximale | 5 GB versus 1 GB |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 9372 versus 830 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 892 versus 253 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 32343 versus 2902 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 121.124 versus 10.872 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1958.592 versus 166.832 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 8.452 versus 0.817 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 120.742 versus 12.415 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 510.941 versus 36.916 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11437 versus 1951 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 versus 1693 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11437 versus 1951 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 versus 1693 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3404 versus 327 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GT 730
- Environ 53% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 49 Watt versus 75 Watt
- Environ 98% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3324 versus 1676
- Environ 98% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3324 versus 1676
Caractéristiques | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 49 Watt versus 75 Watt |
Référence | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3324 versus 1676 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3324 versus 1676 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro P2200
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 730
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA Quadro P2200 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 730 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 9372 | 830 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 892 | 253 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 32343 | 2902 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 121.124 | 10.872 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1958.592 | 166.832 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 8.452 | 0.817 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 120.742 | 12.415 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 510.941 | 36.916 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11437 | 1951 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 | 1693 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1676 | 3324 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11437 | 1951 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 | 1693 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1676 | 3324 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3404 | 327 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA Quadro P2200 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 730 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Pascal | Fermi |
Nom de code | GP106 | GF108 |
Date de sortie | 10 June 2019 | 18 June 2014 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 307 | 1311 |
Genre | Workstation | Desktop |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $59.99 | |
Prix maintenant | $54.99 | |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 20.48 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1493 MHz | |
Vitesse du noyau | 1000 MHz | 700 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 16 nm | 40 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 119.4 GFLOPS | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 59.72 GFLOPS | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 3.822 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 1280 | 384 |
Pixel fill rate | 59.72 GPixel/s | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 119.4 GTexel/s | 14.43 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 49 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 4400 million | 585 million |
Performance á point flottant | 692.7 gflops | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | 4x DisplayPort | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Longeur | 201 mm (7.9") | 145 mm |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | None |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenCL | 1.2 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.4 | |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 5 GB | 1 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 200.2 GB/s | 40.1 GB / s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 160 bit | 64 Bit |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5X | GDDR5 |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1600 MHz |