NVIDIA Quadro P2200 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 730
Vergleichende Analyse von NVIDIA Quadro P2200 und NVIDIA GeForce GT 730 Videokarten für alle bekannten Merkmale in den folgenden Kategorien: Essenzielles, Technische Info, Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse, Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen, API-Unterstützung, Speicher. Benchmark-Videokarten Leistungsanalyse: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Unterschiede
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der NVIDIA Quadro P2200
- Grafikkarte ist neuer: Startdatum 4 Jahr(e) 11 Monat(e) später
- Etwa 43% höhere Kerntaktfrequenz:1000 MHz vs 700 MHz
- 8274.4x mehr Texturfüllrate: 119.4 GTexel/s vs 14.43 GTexel / s
- 3.3x mehr Leitungssysteme: 1280 vs 384
- Ein neuerer Herstellungsprozess ermöglicht eine leistungsfähigere, aber dennoch kühlere Grafikkarte: 16 nm vs 40 nm
- 5x mehr maximale Speichergröße: 5 GB vs 1 GB
- 11.3x bessere Leistung in PassMark - G3D Mark: 9372 vs 830
- 3.5x bessere Leistung in PassMark - G2D Mark: 892 vs 253
- 11.1x bessere Leistung in Geekbench - OpenCL: 32343 vs 2902
- 11.1x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 121.124 vs 10.872
- 11.7x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1958.592 vs 166.832
- 10.3x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 8.452 vs 0.817
- 9.7x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 120.742 vs 12.415
- 13.8x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 510.941 vs 36.916
- 5.9x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 11437 vs 1951
- 2.2x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3717 vs 1693
- 5.9x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 11437 vs 1951
- 2.2x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3717 vs 1693
- 10.4x bessere Leistung in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 3404 vs 327
Spezifikationen | |
Startdatum | 10 June 2019 vs 18 June 2014 |
Kerntaktfrequenz | 1000 MHz vs 700 MHz |
Texturfüllrate | 119.4 GTexel/s vs 14.43 GTexel / s |
Leitungssysteme | 1280 vs 384 |
Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 16 nm vs 40 nm |
Maximale Speichergröße | 5 GB vs 1 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 9372 vs 830 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 892 vs 253 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 32343 vs 2902 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 121.124 vs 10.872 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1958.592 vs 166.832 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 8.452 vs 0.817 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 120.742 vs 12.415 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 510.941 vs 36.916 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11437 vs 1951 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 vs 1693 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11437 vs 1951 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 vs 1693 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3404 vs 327 |
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der NVIDIA GeForce GT 730
- Etwa 53% geringere typische Leistungsaufnahme: 49 Watt vs 75 Watt
- Etwa 98% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3324 vs 1676
- Etwa 98% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3324 vs 1676
Spezifikationen | |
Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 49 Watt vs 75 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3324 vs 1676 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3324 vs 1676 |
Benchmarks vergleichen
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro P2200
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 730
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Quadro P2200 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 730 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 9372 | 830 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 892 | 253 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 32343 | 2902 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 121.124 | 10.872 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1958.592 | 166.832 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 8.452 | 0.817 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 120.742 | 12.415 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 510.941 | 36.916 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11437 | 1951 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 | 1693 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1676 | 3324 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11437 | 1951 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 | 1693 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1676 | 3324 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3404 | 327 |
Vergleichen Sie Spezifikationen
NVIDIA Quadro P2200 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 730 | |
---|---|---|
Essenzielles |
||
Architektur | Pascal | Fermi |
Codename | GP106 | GF108 |
Startdatum | 10 June 2019 | 18 June 2014 |
Platz in der Leistungsbewertung | 307 | 1311 |
Typ | Workstation | Desktop |
Einführungspreis (MSRP) | $59.99 | |
Jetzt kaufen | $54.99 | |
Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis (0-100) | 20.48 | |
Technische Info |
||
Boost-Taktfrequenz | 1493 MHz | |
Kerntaktfrequenz | 1000 MHz | 700 MHz |
Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 16 nm | 40 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 119.4 GFLOPS | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 59.72 GFLOPS | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 3.822 TFLOPS | |
Leitungssysteme | 1280 | 384 |
Pixel fill rate | 59.72 GPixel/s | |
Texturfüllrate | 119.4 GTexel/s | 14.43 GTexel / s |
Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 75 Watt | 49 Watt |
Anzahl der Transistoren | 4400 million | 585 million |
Gleitkomma-Leistung | 692.7 gflops | |
Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse |
||
Display-Anschlüsse | 4x DisplayPort | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen |
||
Schnittstelle | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Länge | 201 mm (7.9") | 145 mm |
Zusätzliche Leistungssteckverbinder | None | None |
API-Unterstützung |
||
DirectX | 12.0 | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenCL | 1.2 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.4 | |
Vulkan | ||
Speicher |
||
Maximale RAM-Belastung | 5 GB | 1 GB |
Speicherbandbreite | 200.2 GB/s | 40.1 GB / s |
Breite des Speicherbusses | 160 bit | 64 Bit |
Speichertyp | GDDR5X | GDDR5 |
Speichertaktfrequenz | 1600 MHz |