NVIDIA Quadro P2200 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro P2200 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P2200

• Videocard is newer: launch date 3 month(s) later
• Around 60% lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 120 Watt
• Around 12% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 905 vs 807

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

• Around 50% higher core clock speed: 1500 MHz vs 1000 MHz
• Around 19% higher boost clock speed: 1770 MHz vs 1493 MHz
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 16 nm
• Around 38% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 12907 vs 9335
• Around 87% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 60773 vs 32447
• Around 72% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 208.608 vs 121.124
• Around 31% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 2573.643 vs 1958.592
• Around 95% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 16.447 vs 8.452
• Around 21% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 145.886 vs 120.742
• Around 81% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 926.614 vs 510.941
• Around 48% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 16952 vs 11437
• 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3355 vs 1676
• Around 48% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 16952 vs 11437
• 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3355 vs 1676
• Around 84% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 6273 vs 3404

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro P2200
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	9335 12907
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	905 807
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	32447 60773
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	121.124 208.608
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1958.592 2573.643
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8.452 16.447
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	120.742 145.886
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	510.941 926.614
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	11437 16952
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3717 3718
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1676 3355
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	11437 16952
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3717 3718
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1676 3355
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	3404 6273

Compare specifications (specs)