NVIDIA Quadro P2200 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro P2200 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P2200

• Videocard is newer: launch date 5 month(s) later
• 2.1x lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 160 Watt
• Around 20% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 892 vs 746
• 2.7x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 3404 vs 1242

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060

• Around 37% higher core clock speed: 1365 MHz vs 1000 MHz
• Around 13% higher boost clock speed: 1680 MHz vs 1493 MHz
• Around 50% higher pipelines: 1920 vs 1280
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 16 nm
• Around 20% higher maximum memory size: 6 GB vs 5 GB
• Around 51% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 14119 vs 9372
• 2.2x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 71402 vs 32343
• Around 79% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 217.04 vs 121.124
• Around 59% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 3119.736 vs 1958.592
• 2.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 21.707 vs 8.452
• Around 11% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 133.975 vs 120.742
• 2.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1141.283 vs 510.941
• Around 76% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 20094 vs 11437
• 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 7442 vs 3717
• 4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 6714 vs 1676
• Around 76% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 20094 vs 11437
• 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 7442 vs 3717
• 4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 6714 vs 1676

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro P2200
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	9372 14119
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	892 746
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	32343 71402
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	121.124 217.04
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1958.592 3119.736
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8.452 21.707
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	120.742 133.975
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	510.941 1141.283
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	11437 20094
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3717 7442
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1676 6714
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	11437 20094
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3717 7442
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1676 6714
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	3404 1242

Compare specifications (specs)