NVIDIA Quadro P2200 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro P2200 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P2200

• Videocard is newer: launch date 5 month(s) later
• 2.1x lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 160 Watt
• Around 22% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 909 vs 748

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060

• Around 37% higher core clock speed: 1365 MHz vs 1000 MHz
• Around 13% higher boost clock speed: 1680 MHz vs 1493 MHz
• Around 50% higher pipelines: 1920 vs 1280
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 16 nm
• Around 20% higher maximum memory size: 6 GB vs 5 GB
• Around 52% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 14150 vs 9318
• 2.2x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 71588 vs 32420
• Around 80% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 217.59 vs 121.124
• Around 58% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 3103.927 vs 1958.592
• 2.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 21.666 vs 8.452
• Around 12% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 134.68 vs 120.742
• 2.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1155.956 vs 510.941
• Around 76% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 20094 vs 11437
• 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 7442 vs 3717
• 4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 6714 vs 1676
• Around 76% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 20094 vs 11437
• 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 7442 vs 3717
• 4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 6714 vs 1676
• 2.2x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 7484 vs 3404

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro P2200
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	9318 14150
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	909 748
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	32420 71588
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	121.124 217.59
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1958.592 3103.927
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8.452 21.666
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	120.742 134.68
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	510.941 1155.956
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	11437 20094
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3717 7442
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1676 6714
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	11437 20094
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3717 7442
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1676 6714
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	3404 7484

Compare specifications (specs)