NVIDIA Quadro P2200 vs NVIDIA Quadro K6000

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro P2200 and NVIDIA Quadro K6000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P2200

• Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 10 month(s) later
• Around 25% higher core clock speed: 1000 MHz vs 797 MHz
• Around 66% higher boost clock speed: 1493 MHz vs 902 MHz
• 551.5x more texture fill rate: 119.4 GTexel/s vs 216.5 GTexel / s
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 16 nm vs 28 nm
• 3x lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 225 Watt
• Around 16% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 9372 vs 8096
• Around 62% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 892 vs 551
• Around 35% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 32343 vs 24013
• Around 80% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 121.124 vs 67.178
• Around 8% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1958.592 vs 1816.61
• Around 14% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 8.452 vs 7.435
• Around 36% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 120.742 vs 88.889
• Around 44% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 510.941 vs 355.166

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K6000

• 2.3x more pipelines: 2880 vs 1280
• 2.4x more maximum memory size: 12 GB vs 5 GB
• Around 11% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 12657 vs 11437
• 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3356 vs 1676
• Around 11% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 12657 vs 11437
• 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3356 vs 1676

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro P2200
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro K6000

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	9372 8096
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	892 551
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	32343 24013
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	121.124 67.178
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1958.592 1816.61
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8.452 7.435
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	120.742 88.889
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	510.941 355.166
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	11437 12657
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3717 3711
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1676 3356
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	11437 12657
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3717 3711
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1676 3356

Compare specifications (specs)