NVIDIA Quadro P2200 versus NVIDIA Quadro K6000
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA Quadro P2200 and NVIDIA Quadro K6000 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro P2200
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 5 ans 10 mois plus tard
- Environ 25% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1000 MHz versus 797 MHz
- Environ 66% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1493 MHz versus 902 MHz
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 119.4 GTexel/s versus 216.5 GTexel / s
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 16 nm versus 28 nm
- 3x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 75 Watt versus 225 Watt
- Environ 16% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 9372 versus 8096
- Environ 62% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 892 versus 551
- Environ 35% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 32343 versus 24013
- Environ 80% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 121.124 versus 67.178
- Environ 8% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1958.592 versus 1816.61
- Environ 14% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 8.452 versus 7.435
- Environ 36% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 120.742 versus 88.889
- Environ 44% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 510.941 versus 355.166
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 10 June 2019 versus 23 July 2013 |
Vitesse du noyau | 1000 MHz versus 797 MHz |
Vitesse augmenté | 1493 MHz versus 902 MHz |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 119.4 GTexel/s versus 216.5 GTexel / s |
Processus de fabrication | 16 nm versus 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt versus 225 Watt |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 9372 versus 8096 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 892 versus 551 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 32343 versus 24013 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 121.124 versus 67.178 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1958.592 versus 1816.61 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 8.452 versus 7.435 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 120.742 versus 88.889 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 510.941 versus 355.166 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 versus 3711 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 versus 3711 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro K6000
- 2.3x plus de pipelines: 2880 versus 1280
- 2.4x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 12 GB versus 5 GB
- Environ 11% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 12657 versus 11437
- 2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3356 versus 1676
- Environ 11% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 12657 versus 11437
- 2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3356 versus 1676
Caractéristiques | |
Pipelines | 2880 versus 1280 |
Taille de mémore maximale | 12 GB versus 5 GB |
Référence | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 12657 versus 11437 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 versus 1676 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 12657 versus 11437 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 versus 1676 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro P2200
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro K6000
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA Quadro P2200 | NVIDIA Quadro K6000 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 9372 | 8096 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 892 | 551 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 32343 | 24013 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 121.124 | 67.178 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1958.592 | 1816.61 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 8.452 | 7.435 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 120.742 | 88.889 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 510.941 | 355.166 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11437 | 12657 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 | 3711 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1676 | 3356 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11437 | 12657 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 | 3711 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1676 | 3356 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3404 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA Quadro P2200 | NVIDIA Quadro K6000 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Pascal | Kepler |
Nom de code | GP106 | GK110B |
Date de sortie | 10 June 2019 | 23 July 2013 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 307 | 364 |
Genre | Workstation | Workstation |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $5,265 | |
Prix maintenant | $833.98 | |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 11.34 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1493 MHz | 902 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 1000 MHz | 797 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 16 nm | 28 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 119.4 GFLOPS | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 59.72 GFLOPS | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 3.822 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 1280 | 2880 |
Pixel fill rate | 59.72 GPixel/s | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 119.4 GTexel/s | 216.5 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 225 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 4400 million | 7,080 million |
Performance á point flottant | 5,196 gflops | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | 4x DisplayPort | 2x DVI, 2x DisplayPort |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Longeur | 201 mm (7.9") | 267 mm |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | 2x 6-pin |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 | 12.0 (11_1) |
OpenCL | 1.2 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.4 | |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 5 GB | 12 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 200.2 GB/s | 288.4 GB / s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 160 bit | 384 Bit |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5X | GDDR5 |
Vitesse de mémoire | 6008 MHz |