NVIDIA Quadro P2200 vs NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Max-Q
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro P2200 and NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Max-Q videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P2200
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 3 month(s) later
- Around 6% higher boost clock speed: 1493 MHz vs 1404 MHz
- Around 1% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 9321 vs 9219
- Around 74% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 920 vs 530
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 10 June 2019 vs 21 February 2018 |
| Boost clock speed | 1493 MHz vs 1404 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 9321 vs 9219 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 920 vs 530 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Max-Q
- Around 14% higher core clock speed: 1139 MHz vs 1000 MHz
- Around 7% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 33770 vs 31476
- Around 18% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 13448 vs 11437
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3358 vs 1676
- Around 18% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 13448 vs 11437
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3358 vs 1676
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1139 MHz vs 1000 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 33770 vs 31476 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 13448 vs 11437 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 vs 1676 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 13448 vs 11437 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 vs 1676 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro P2200
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Max-Q
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA Quadro P2200 | NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Max-Q |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 9321 | 9219 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 920 | 530 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 31476 | 33770 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 121.124 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1958.592 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 8.452 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 120.742 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 510.941 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11437 | 13448 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 | 3717 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1676 | 3358 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11437 | 13448 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 | 3717 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1676 | 3358 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3404 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA Quadro P2200 | NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Max-Q | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Pascal | Pascal |
| Code name | GP106 | GP104 |
| Launch date | 10 June 2019 | 21 February 2018 |
| Place in performance rating | 305 | 263 |
| Type | Workstation | Workstation |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1493 MHz | 1404 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 1000 MHz | 1139 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm | 16 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 119.4 GFLOPS | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 59.72 GFLOPS | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 3.822 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 1280 | |
| Pixel fill rate | 59.72 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 119.4 GTexel/s | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 75 Watt |
| Transistor count | 4400 million | 7,200 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 4x DisplayPort | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
| Length | 201 mm (7.9") | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 5 GB | |
| Memory bandwidth | 200.2 GB/s | |
| Memory bus width | 160 bit | |
| Memory type | GDDR5X | |
| Memory clock speed | 7012 MHz | |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA Quadro P2200 with others
NVIDIAQuadro P2200 vs
ATIFireMV 2260
NVIDIAQuadro P2200 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM Rebrand
NVIDIAQuadro P2200 vs
AMDRadeon R9 M390X
NVIDIAQuadro P2200 vs
AMDRadeon R7 M465X
NVIDIAQuadro P2200 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop)
NVIDIAQuadro P2200 vs
AMDRadeon Pro W6600X
