NVIDIA Quadro P2200 versus NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Max-Q
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA Quadro P2200 and NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Max-Q pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro P2200
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 3 mois plus tard
- Environ 6% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1493 MHz versus 1404 MHz
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 9324 versus 9219
- Environ 73% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 918 versus 530
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 10 June 2019 versus 21 February 2018 |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1493 MHz versus 1404 MHz |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 9324 versus 9219 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 918 versus 530 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Max-Q
- Environ 14% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1139 MHz versus 1000 MHz
- Environ 7% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 33770 versus 31480
- Environ 18% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 13448 versus 11437
- 2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3358 versus 1676
- Environ 18% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 13448 versus 11437
- 2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3358 versus 1676
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1139 MHz versus 1000 MHz |
| Référence | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 33770 versus 31480 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 13448 versus 11437 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 versus 1676 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 13448 versus 11437 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 versus 1676 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro P2200
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Max-Q
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA Quadro P2200 | NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Max-Q |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 9324 | 9219 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 918 | 530 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 31480 | 33770 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 121.124 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1958.592 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 8.452 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 120.742 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 510.941 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11437 | 13448 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 | 3717 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1676 | 3358 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11437 | 13448 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 | 3717 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1676 | 3358 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3404 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA Quadro P2200 | NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Max-Q | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Pascal | Pascal |
| Nom de code | GP106 | GP104 |
| Date de sortie | 10 June 2019 | 21 February 2018 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 304 | 264 |
| Genre | Workstation | Workstation |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1493 MHz | 1404 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1000 MHz | 1139 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 16 nm | 16 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 119.4 GFLOPS | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 59.72 GFLOPS | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 3.822 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 1280 | |
| Pixel fill rate | 59.72 GPixel/s | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 119.4 GTexel/s | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 75 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 4400 million | 7,200 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | 4x DisplayPort | No outputs |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
| Longeur | 201 mm (7.9") | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | None |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 5 GB | |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 200.2 GB/s | |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 160 bit | |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5X | |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 7012 MHz | |
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA Quadro P2200 avec des autres
NVIDIAQuadro P2200 vs
ATIFireMV 2260
NVIDIAQuadro P2200 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM Rebrand
NVIDIAQuadro P2200 vs
AMDRadeon R9 M390X
NVIDIAQuadro P2200 vs
AMDRadeon R7 M465X
NVIDIAQuadro P2200 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop)
NVIDIAQuadro P2200 vs
AMDRadeon Pro W6600X
