NVIDIA Quadro P2200 vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro P2200 and NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P2200

• Videocard is newer: launch date 6 month(s) later
• 2.1x lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 160 Watt
• Around 82% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 3404 vs 1873

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000

• Around 1% higher core clock speed: 1005 MHz vs 1000 MHz
• Around 3% higher boost clock speed: 1545 MHz vs 1493 MHz
• Around 86% higher texture fill rate: 222.5 GTexel/s vs 119.4 GTexel/s
• Around 80% higher pipelines: 2304 vs 1280
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 16 nm
• Around 60% higher maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 5 GB
• 2.6x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 85209 vs 32343
• Around 92% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 232.933 vs 121.124
• Around 90% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 3728.135 vs 1958.592
• 2.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 24.872 vs 8.452
• Around 13% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 136.223 vs 120.742
• Around 98% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1011.233 vs 510.941
• Around 77% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 20206 vs 11437
• 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3359 vs 1676
• Around 77% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 20206 vs 11437
• 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3359 vs 1676

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro P2200
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000

Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	32343 85209
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	121.124 232.933
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1958.592 3728.135
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8.452 24.872
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	120.742 136.223
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	510.941 1011.233
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	11437 20206
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3717 3714
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1676 3359
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	11437 20206
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3717 3714
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1676 3359
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	3404 1873

Compare specifications (specs)