NVIDIA Quadro P400 vs AMD FirePro W4100

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro P400 and AMD FirePro W4100 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P400

• Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 5 month(s) later
• Around 95% higher core clock speed: 1228 MHz vs 630 MHz
• Around 5% higher texture fill rate: 21.25 GTexel / s vs 20.16 GTexel / s
• Around 5% better floating-point performance: 679.9 gflops vs 645.1 gflops
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
• Around 67% lower typical power consumption: 30 Watt vs 50 Watt
• Around 10% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1651 vs 1504
• Around 27% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 19.856 vs 15.65
• Around 12% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 84.489 vs 75.309
• Around 39% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2709 vs 1951
• 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3328 vs 1620
• Around 39% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2709 vs 1951
• 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3328 vs 1620

Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro W4100

• 2x more pipelines: 512 vs 256
• Around 4% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 453 vs 435
• Around 78% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 5447 vs 3053
• Around 74% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 538.848 vs 309.824
• Around 18% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.631 vs 1.38
• Around 26% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 31.533 vs 25.011
• Around 18% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3399 vs 2875
• Around 18% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3399 vs 2875

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro P400
GPU 2: AMD FirePro W4100

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	1651 1504
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	435 453
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	3053 5447
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	19.856 15.65
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	309.824 538.848
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1.38 1.631
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	25.011 31.533
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	84.489 75.309
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2709 1951
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2875 3399
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3328 1620
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2709 1951
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2875 3399
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3328 1620

Compare specifications (specs)