NVIDIA Quadro P400 vs Intel HD Graphics 3000

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro P400 and Intel HD Graphics 3000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

NVIDIA Quadro P400

vs

Intel HD Graphics 3000

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P400

• Videocard is newer: launch date 6 year(s) 0 month(s) later
• Around 44% higher core clock speed: 1228 MHz vs 850 MHz
• Around 14% higher boost clock speed: 1252 MHz vs 1100 MHz
• 12.5x more texture fill rate: 21.25 GTexel / s vs 1.7 GTexel / s
• 21.3x more pipelines: 256 vs 12
• 33.3x better floating-point performance: 679.9 gflops vs 20.4 gflops
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 32 nm
• 6.3x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1651 vs 261
• 12.4x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 435 vs 35
• 2.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2875 vs 1137
• 33x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3328 vs 101
• 2.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2875 vs 1137
• 33x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3328 vs 101

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro P400
GPU 2: Intel HD Graphics 3000

Compare specifications (specs)