NVIDIA Quadro P400 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro P400 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P400

• Videocard is newer: launch date 6 month(s) later
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 16 nm
• 4x lower typical power consumption: 30 Watt vs 120 Watt
• Around 15% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 25.011 vs 21.766

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB

• Around 23% higher core clock speed: 1506 MHz vs 1228 MHz
• Around 37% higher boost clock speed: 1709 MHz vs 1252 MHz
• 6.4x more texture fill rate: 136.7 GTexel / s vs 21.25 GTexel / s
• 5x more pipelines: 1280 vs 256
• 6.4x better floating-point performance: 4,375 gflops vs 679.9 gflops
• 3x more maximum memory size: 6 GB vs 2 GB
• 2x more memory clock speed: 8008 MHz vs 4012 MHz
• 6.1x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 10079 vs 1651
• Around 72% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 747 vs 435
• 11.6x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 35369 vs 3053
• 6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 119.148 vs 19.856
• 4.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1373.562 vs 309.824
• 6.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 8.694 vs 1.38
• 5.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 454.799 vs 84.489
• 4.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 12442 vs 2709
• Around 28% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3691 vs 2875
• 4.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 12442 vs 2709
• Around 28% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3691 vs 2875
• Around 47% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 907 vs 617

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro P400
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	1651 10079
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	435 747
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	3053 35369
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	19.856 119.148
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	309.824 1373.562
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1.38 8.694
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	25.011 21.766
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	84.489 454.799
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2709 12442
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2875 3691
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3328 3340
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2709 12442
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2875 3691
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3328 3340
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	617 907

Compare specifications (specs)