NVIDIA Quadro P4000 vs AMD Radeon R7 M445
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro P4000 and AMD Radeon R7 M445 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P4000
- Videocard is newer: launch date 8 month(s) later
- Around 54% higher core clock speed: 1202 MHz vs 780 MHz
- Around 61% higher boost clock speed: 1480 MHz vs 920 MHz
- 9x more texture fill rate: 165.8 GTexel / s vs 18.4 GTexel / s
- 5.6x more pipelines: 1792 vs 320
- 9x better floating-point performance: 5,304 gflops vs 588.8 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 16 nm vs 28 nm
- 2x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 4 GB
- Around 90% higher memory clock speed: 7604 MHz vs 4000 MHz
- 12.3x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 11545 vs 939
- 4.5x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 795 vs 176
- 7.9x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 42289 vs 5361
- 9.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 152.325 vs 15.765
- 5.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1590.392 vs 278.624
- 9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 11.365 vs 1.268
- Around 89% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 45.977 vs 24.335
- 13.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 751.626 vs 54.067
- 8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 15267 vs 1913
- Around 74% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3714 vs 2138
- Around 81% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3358 vs 1853
- 8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 15267 vs 1913
- Around 74% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3714 vs 2138
- Around 81% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3358 vs 1853
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 6 February 2017 vs 15 May 2016 |
Core clock speed | 1202 MHz vs 780 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1480 MHz vs 920 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 165.8 GTexel / s vs 18.4 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 1792 vs 320 |
Floating-point performance | 5,304 gflops vs 588.8 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm vs 28 nm |
Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 4 GB |
Memory clock speed | 7604 MHz vs 4000 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 11545 vs 939 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 795 vs 176 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 42289 vs 5361 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 152.325 vs 15.765 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1590.392 vs 278.624 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 11.365 vs 1.268 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 45.977 vs 24.335 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 751.626 vs 54.067 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 15267 vs 1913 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3714 vs 2138 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 vs 1853 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 15267 vs 1913 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3714 vs 2138 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 vs 1853 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 M445
- 4x lower typical power consumption: 15-25 Watt vs 100 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15-25 Watt vs 100 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro P4000
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R7 M445
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Quadro P4000 | AMD Radeon R7 M445 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 11545 | 939 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 795 | 176 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 42289 | 5361 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 152.325 | 15.765 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1590.392 | 278.624 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 11.365 | 1.268 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 45.977 | 24.335 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 751.626 | 54.067 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 15267 | 1913 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3714 | 2138 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | 1853 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 15267 | 1913 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3714 | 2138 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 | 1853 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1115 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Quadro P4000 | AMD Radeon R7 M445 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Pascal | GCN 3.0 |
Code name | GP104 | Meso |
Launch date | 6 February 2017 | 15 May 2016 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $815 | |
Place in performance rating | 287 | 1296 |
Price now | $799.99 | |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Value for money (0-100) | 17.17 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1480 MHz | 920 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1202 MHz | 780 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 5,304 gflops | 588.8 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 1792 | 320 |
Texture fill rate | 165.8 GTexel / s | 18.4 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt | 15-25 Watt |
Transistor count | 7,200 million | 3,100 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 4x DisplayPort | No outputs |
Display Port | 1.4 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Length | 241 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (12_0) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 5.1 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 4 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 192 GB / s | 32 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 7604 MHz | 4000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | 0 |
Technologies |
||
3D Stereo | ||
Mosaic | ||
nView Display Management | ||
Optimus |