NVIDIA Quadro P4000 vs NVIDIA Quadro K2200

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro P4000 and NVIDIA Quadro K2200 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

NVIDIA Quadro P4000

NVIDIA Quadro K2200

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P4000

Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 6 month(s) later
Around 15% higher core clock speed: 1202 MHz vs 1046 MHz
Around 32% higher boost clock speed: 1480 MHz vs 1124 MHz
3.7x more texture fill rate: 165.8 GTexel / s vs 44.96 GTexel / s
2.8x more pipelines: 1792 vs 640
3.7x better floating-point performance: 5,304 gflops vs 1,439 gflops
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 16 nm vs 28 nm
2x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 4 GB
Around 52% higher memory clock speed: 7604 MHz vs 5012 MHz
3.2x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 11545 vs 3572
Around 45% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 795 vs 548
3.5x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 42289 vs 12020
3.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 152.325 vs 40.695
2.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1590.392 vs 588.094
3.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 11.365 vs 3.205
Around 51% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 45.977 vs 30.455
4.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 751.626 vs 166.26
3.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 15267 vs 4921
2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3714 vs 1577
2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3358 vs 1671
3.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 15267 vs 4921
2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3714 vs 1577
2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3358 vs 1671

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	6 February 2017 vs 22 July 2014
Core clock speed	1202 MHz vs 1046 MHz
Boost clock speed	1480 MHz vs 1124 MHz
Texture fill rate	165.8 GTexel / s vs 44.96 GTexel / s
Pipelines	1792 vs 640
Floating-point performance	5,304 gflops vs 1,439 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	16 nm vs 28 nm
Maximum memory size	8 GB vs 4 GB
Memory clock speed	7604 MHz vs 5012 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	11545 vs 3572
PassMark - G2D Mark	795 vs 548
Geekbench - OpenCL	42289 vs 12020
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	152.325 vs 40.695
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	1590.392 vs 588.094
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	11.365 vs 3.205
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	45.977 vs 30.455
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	751.626 vs 166.26
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	15267 vs 4921
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3714 vs 1577
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3358 vs 1671
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	15267 vs 4921
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3714 vs 1577
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3358 vs 1671

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K2200

Around 47% lower typical power consumption: 68 Watt vs 100 Watt
Around 7% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 1193 vs 1115

Specifications (specs)
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	68 Watt vs 100 Watt
Benchmarks
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	1193 vs 1115

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro P4000
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro K2200

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

11545

3572

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

795

548

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

42289

12020

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

152.325

40.695

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1590.392

588.094

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

11.365

3.205

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

45.977

30.455

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

751.626

166.26

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

15267

4921

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3714

1577

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3358

1671

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

15267

4921

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3714

1577

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3358

1671

3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score

GPU 1

GPU 2

1115

1193

Name	NVIDIA Quadro P4000	NVIDIA Quadro K2200
PassMark - G3D Mark	11545	3572
PassMark - G2D Mark	795	548
Geekbench - OpenCL	42289	12020
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	152.325	40.695
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	1590.392	588.094
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	11.365	3.205
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	45.977	30.455
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	751.626	166.26
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	15267	4921
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3714	1577
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3358	1671
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	15267	4921
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3714	1577
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3358	1671
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	1115	1193

Compare specifications (specs)

	NVIDIA Quadro P4000	NVIDIA Quadro K2200
Essentials
Architecture	Pascal	Maxwell
Code name	GP104	GM107
Launch date	6 February 2017	22 July 2014
Launch price (MSRP)	$815	$395.75
Place in performance rating	287	787
Price now	$799.99	$343.99
Type	Workstation	Workstation
Value for money (0-100)	17.17	13.01
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1480 MHz	1124 MHz
Core clock speed	1202 MHz	1046 MHz
Floating-point performance	5,304 gflops	1,439 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	16 nm	28 nm
Pipelines	1792	640
Texture fill rate	165.8 GTexel / s	44.96 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	100 Watt	68 Watt
Transistor count	7,200 million	1,870 million
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	4x DisplayPort	1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort
Display Port	1.4
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 2.0 x16
Length	241 mm	202 mm
Supplementary power connectors	1x 6-pin	None
API support
DirectX	12	12.0 (11_0)
OpenGL	4.5	4.6
Shader Model	5.1
Vulkan
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	4 GB
Memory bandwidth	192 GB / s	80.19 GB / s
Memory bus width	256 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	7604 MHz	5012 MHz
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Shared memory	0
Technologies
3D Stereo
Mosaic
nView Display Management
Optimus