NVIDIA Quadro P4000 vs NVIDIA Quadro M2000
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro P4000 and NVIDIA Quadro M2000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P4000
- Videocard is newer: launch date 9 month(s) later
- Around 51% higher core clock speed: 1202 MHz vs 796 MHz
- Around 27% higher boost clock speed: 1480 MHz vs 1163 MHz
- 2.9x more texture fill rate: 165.8 GTexel / s vs 56.64 GTexel / s
- 2.3x more pipelines: 1792 vs 768
- 2.9x better floating-point performance: 5,304 gflops vs 1,812 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 16 nm vs 28 nm
- 2x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 4 GB
- Around 15% higher memory clock speed: 7604 MHz vs 6612 MHz
- 2.9x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 11545 vs 4000
- Around 41% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 795 vs 565
- 2.9x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 42289 vs 14591
- 2.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 152.325 vs 55.048
- 2.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1590.392 vs 639.056
- 3.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 11.365 vs 3.697
- Around 28% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 45.977 vs 35.796
- 3.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 751.626 vs 225.868
- 2.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 15267 vs 5523
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3714 vs 3684
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3358 vs 3325
- 2.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 15267 vs 5523
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3714 vs 3684
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3358 vs 3325
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 6 February 2017 vs 8 April 2016 |
Core clock speed | 1202 MHz vs 796 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1480 MHz vs 1163 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 165.8 GTexel / s vs 56.64 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 1792 vs 768 |
Floating-point performance | 5,304 gflops vs 1,812 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm vs 28 nm |
Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 4 GB |
Memory clock speed | 7604 MHz vs 6612 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 11545 vs 4000 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 795 vs 565 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 42289 vs 14591 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 152.325 vs 55.048 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1590.392 vs 639.056 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 11.365 vs 3.697 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 45.977 vs 35.796 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 751.626 vs 225.868 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 15267 vs 5523 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3714 vs 3684 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 vs 3325 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 15267 vs 5523 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3714 vs 3684 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 vs 3325 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro M2000
- Around 33% lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 100 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt vs 100 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro P4000
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro M2000
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Quadro P4000 | NVIDIA Quadro M2000 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 11545 | 4000 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 795 | 565 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 42289 | 14591 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 152.325 | 55.048 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1590.392 | 639.056 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 11.365 | 3.697 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 45.977 | 35.796 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 751.626 | 225.868 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 15267 | 5523 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3714 | 3684 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | 3325 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 15267 | 5523 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3714 | 3684 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 | 3325 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1115 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Quadro P4000 | NVIDIA Quadro M2000 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Pascal | Maxwell 2.0 |
Code name | GP104 | GM206 |
Launch date | 6 February 2017 | 8 April 2016 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $815 | $437.75 |
Place in performance rating | 287 | 572 |
Price now | $799.99 | $409.99 |
Type | Workstation | Workstation |
Value for money (0-100) | 17.17 | 13.23 |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1480 MHz | 1163 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1202 MHz | 796 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 5,304 gflops | 1,812 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 1792 | 768 |
Texture fill rate | 165.8 GTexel / s | 56.64 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt | 75 Watt |
Transistor count | 7,200 million | 2,940 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 4x DisplayPort | 4x DisplayPort, DP DP DP DP |
Display Port | 1.4 | |
Number of simultaneous displays | 4 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 241 mm | 201 mm |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | None |
Width | 1" (2.5 cm) | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 4 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 192 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 7604 MHz | 6612 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | 128 Bit |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Stereo | ||
Mosaic | ||
nView Display Management | ||
Optimus | ||
3D Vision Pro | ||
nView Desktop Management |