NVIDIA Quadro P4000 vs NVIDIA Quadro P5000
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro P4000 and NVIDIA Quadro P5000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P4000
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 month(s) later
- Around 18% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 795 vs 673
- Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3714 vs 3409
- Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3358 vs 3077
- Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3714 vs 3409
- Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3358 vs 3077
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 6 February 2017 vs 1 October 2016 |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 795 vs 673 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3714 vs 3409 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 vs 3077 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3714 vs 3409 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 vs 3077 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P5000
- Around 34% higher core clock speed: 1607 MHz vs 1202 MHz
- Around 17% higher boost clock speed: 1733 MHz vs 1480 MHz
- Around 67% higher texture fill rate: 277.3 GTexel / s vs 165.8 GTexel / s
- Around 14% higher pipelines: 2048 vs 1792
- Around 67% better floating-point performance: 8,873 gflops vs 5,304 gflops
- 2x more maximum memory size: 16 GB vs 8 GB
- Around 19% higher memory clock speed: 9016 MHz vs 7604 MHz
- Around 9% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 12640 vs 11545
- Around 24% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 52508 vs 42289
- Around 47% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 223.558 vs 152.325
- Around 70% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 2698.914 vs 1590.392
- Around 25% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 14.206 vs 11.365
- 3.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 140.845 vs 45.977
- Around 23% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 927.006 vs 751.626
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 15489 vs 15267
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 15489 vs 15267
- Around 19% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 1330 vs 1115
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1607 MHz vs 1202 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1733 MHz vs 1480 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 277.3 GTexel / s vs 165.8 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 2048 vs 1792 |
Floating-point performance | 8,873 gflops vs 5,304 gflops |
Maximum memory size | 16 GB vs 8 GB |
Memory clock speed | 9016 MHz vs 7604 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 12640 vs 11545 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 52508 vs 42289 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 223.558 vs 152.325 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2698.914 vs 1590.392 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 14.206 vs 11.365 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 140.845 vs 45.977 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 927.006 vs 751.626 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 15489 vs 15267 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 15489 vs 15267 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1330 vs 1115 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro P4000
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro P5000
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Quadro P4000 | NVIDIA Quadro P5000 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 11545 | 12640 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 795 | 673 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 42289 | 52508 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 152.325 | 223.558 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1590.392 | 2698.914 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 11.365 | 14.206 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 45.977 | 140.845 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 751.626 | 927.006 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 15267 | 15489 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3714 | 3409 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | 3077 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 15267 | 15489 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3714 | 3409 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 | 3077 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1115 | 1330 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Quadro P4000 | NVIDIA Quadro P5000 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Pascal | Pascal |
Code name | GP104 | GP104 |
Launch date | 6 February 2017 | 1 October 2016 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $815 | $2,499 |
Place in performance rating | 287 | 247 |
Price now | $799.99 | $1,699.99 |
Type | Workstation | Workstation |
Value for money (0-100) | 17.17 | 8.38 |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1480 MHz | 1733 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1202 MHz | 1607 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 5,304 gflops | 8,873 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm | 16 nm |
Pipelines | 1792 | 2048 |
Texture fill rate | 165.8 GTexel / s | 277.3 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt | 100 Watt |
Transistor count | 7,200 million | 7,200 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 4x DisplayPort | 1x DVI, 4x DisplayPort |
Display Port | 1.4 | 1.4 |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 241 mm | 267 mm |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | 1x 8-pin |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 16 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 192 GB / s | 192 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 7604 MHz | 9016 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | 0 |
Technologies |
||
3D Stereo | ||
Mosaic | ||
nView Display Management | ||
Optimus | ||
3D Vision Pro | ||
nView |