NVIDIA Quadro P4000 versus NVIDIA Quadro P5000
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA Quadro P4000 and NVIDIA Quadro P5000 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro P4000
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 4 mois plus tard
- Environ 18% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 795 versus 673
- Environ 9% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3714 versus 3409
- Environ 9% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3358 versus 3077
- Environ 9% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3714 versus 3409
- Environ 9% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3358 versus 3077
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 6 February 2017 versus 1 October 2016 |
Référence | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 795 versus 673 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3714 versus 3409 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 versus 3077 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3714 versus 3409 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 versus 3077 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro P5000
- Environ 34% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1607 MHz versus 1202 MHz
- Environ 17% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1733 MHz versus 1480 MHz
- Environ 67% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 277.3 GTexel / s versus 165.8 GTexel / s
- Environ 14% de pipelines plus haut: 2048 versus 1792
- Environ 67% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 8,873 gflops versus 5,304 gflops
- 2x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 16 GB versus 8 GB
- Environ 19% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 9016 MHz versus 7604 MHz
- Environ 9% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 12640 versus 11545
- Environ 24% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 52508 versus 42289
- Environ 47% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 223.558 versus 152.325
- Environ 70% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 2698.914 versus 1590.392
- Environ 25% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 14.206 versus 11.365
- 3.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 140.845 versus 45.977
- Environ 23% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 927.006 versus 751.626
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 15489 versus 15267
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 15489 versus 15267
- Environ 19% meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 1330 versus 1115
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse du noyau | 1607 MHz versus 1202 MHz |
Vitesse augmenté | 1733 MHz versus 1480 MHz |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 277.3 GTexel / s versus 165.8 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 2048 versus 1792 |
Performance á point flottant | 8,873 gflops versus 5,304 gflops |
Taille de mémore maximale | 16 GB versus 8 GB |
Vitesse de mémoire | 9016 MHz versus 7604 MHz |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 12640 versus 11545 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 52508 versus 42289 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 223.558 versus 152.325 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2698.914 versus 1590.392 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 14.206 versus 11.365 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 140.845 versus 45.977 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 927.006 versus 751.626 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 15489 versus 15267 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 15489 versus 15267 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1330 versus 1115 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro P4000
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro P5000
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA Quadro P4000 | NVIDIA Quadro P5000 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 11545 | 12640 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 795 | 673 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 42289 | 52508 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 152.325 | 223.558 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1590.392 | 2698.914 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 11.365 | 14.206 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 45.977 | 140.845 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 751.626 | 927.006 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 15267 | 15489 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3714 | 3409 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | 3077 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 15267 | 15489 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3714 | 3409 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 | 3077 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1115 | 1330 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA Quadro P4000 | NVIDIA Quadro P5000 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Pascal | Pascal |
Nom de code | GP104 | GP104 |
Date de sortie | 6 February 2017 | 1 October 2016 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $815 | $2,499 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 287 | 247 |
Prix maintenant | $799.99 | $1,699.99 |
Genre | Workstation | Workstation |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 17.17 | 8.38 |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1480 MHz | 1733 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 1202 MHz | 1607 MHz |
Performance á point flottant | 5,304 gflops | 8,873 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 16 nm | 16 nm |
Pipelines | 1792 | 2048 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 165.8 GTexel / s | 277.3 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt | 100 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 7,200 million | 7,200 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | 4x DisplayPort | 1x DVI, 4x DisplayPort |
Display Port | 1.4 | 1.4 |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Longeur | 241 mm | 267 mm |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 6-pin | 1x 8-pin |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 8 GB | 16 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 192 GB / s | 192 GB / s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 7604 MHz | 9016 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Mémoire partagé | 0 | 0 |
Technologies |
||
3D Stereo | ||
Mosaic | ||
nView Display Management | ||
Optimus | ||
3D Vision Pro | ||
nView |