NVIDIA Quadro P5000 vs NVIDIA Quadro M6000

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro P5000 and NVIDIA Quadro M6000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P5000

• Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 6 month(s) later
• Around 63% higher core clock speed: 1607 MHz vs 988 MHz
• Around 56% higher boost clock speed: 1733 MHz vs 1114 MHz
• Around 30% higher texture fill rate: 277.3 GTexel / s vs 213.9 GTexel / s
• Around 30% better floating-point performance: 8,873 gflops vs 6,844 gflops
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 16 nm vs 28 nm
• 2.5x lower typical power consumption: 100 Watt vs 250 Watt
• Around 33% higher maximum memory size: 16 GB vs 12 GB
• Around 36% higher memory clock speed: 9016 MHz vs 6612 MHz
• Around 7% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 12631 vs 11770
• Around 34% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 52901 vs 39571
• Around 8% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 223.558 vs 207.14
• Around 4% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 2698.914 vs 2593.621
• Around 10% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 14.206 vs 12.895
• Around 21% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 927.006 vs 768.171
• Around 13% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 15489 vs 13738
• Around 13% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 15489 vs 13738

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro M6000

• Around 50% higher pipelines: 3072 vs 2048
• Around 8% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 725 vs 672
• Around 3% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 145.003 vs 140.845
• Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3714 vs 3409
• Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3356 vs 3077
• Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3714 vs 3409
• Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3356 vs 3077

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro P5000
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro M6000

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	12631 11770
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	672 725
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	52901 39571
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	223.558 207.14
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2698.914 2593.621
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	14.206 12.895
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	140.845 145.003
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	927.006 768.171
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	15489 13738
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3409 3714
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3077 3356
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	15489 13738
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3409 3714
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3077 3356

Compare specifications (specs)