NVIDIA Quadro P520 vs NVIDIA Quadro M1000M

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro P520 and NVIDIA Quadro M1000M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

NVIDIA Quadro P520

NVIDIA Quadro M1000M

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P520

Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 9 month(s) later
Around 31% higher core clock speed: 1303 MHz vs 993 MHz
Around 39% higher boost clock speed: 1493 MHz vs 1072 MHz
751.7x more texture fill rate: 23.89 GTexel/s vs 31.78 GTexel / s
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
1024x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 2 GB / 4 GB
Around 20% higher memory clock speed: 6000 MHz vs 5012 MHz

Launch date	27 May 2019 vs 18 August 2015
Core clock speed	1303 MHz vs 993 MHz
Boost clock speed	1493 MHz vs 1072 MHz
Texture fill rate	23.89 GTexel/s vs 31.78 GTexel / s
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm vs 28 nm
Maximum memory size	2 GB vs 2 GB / 4 GB
Memory clock speed	6000 MHz vs 5012 MHz

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro M1000M

Around 33% higher pipelines: 512 vs 384
45x lower typical power consumption: 40 Watt vs 1800 million
Around 30% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 307 vs 237
Around 36% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2835 vs 2091
Around 11% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 8849 vs 7960
Around 19% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4196 vs 3527
Around 19% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4196 vs 3527
Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3716 vs 3566
Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3716 vs 3566
Around 46% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3358 vs 2295
Around 46% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3358 vs 2295

Specifications (specs)
Pipelines	512 vs 384
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	40 Watt vs 1800 million
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark	307 vs 237
PassMark - G3D Mark	2835 vs 2091
Geekbench - OpenCL	8849 vs 7960
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	4196 vs 3527
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	4196 vs 3527
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3716 vs 3566
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3716 vs 3566
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3358 vs 2295
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3358 vs 2295

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro P520
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro M1000M

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

237

307

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

2091

2835

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

7960

8849

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3527

4196

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3527

4196

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3566

3716

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3566

3716

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2295

3358

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2295

3358

Name	NVIDIA Quadro P520	NVIDIA Quadro M1000M
PassMark - G2D Mark	237	307
PassMark - G3D Mark	2091	2835
Geekbench - OpenCL	7960	8849
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	3527	4196
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	3527	4196
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3566	3716
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3566	3716
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	2295	3358
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	2295	3358
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)		38.33
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)		721.18
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)		3.056
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)		42.938
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)		137.786
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score		1002

Compare specifications (specs)

	NVIDIA Quadro P520	NVIDIA Quadro M1000M
Essentials
Architecture	Pascal	Maxwell
Code name	GP108	GM107
Launch date	27 May 2019	18 August 2015
Place in performance rating	758	806
Type	Mobile workstation	Mobile workstation
Launch price (MSRP)		$200.89
Price now		$203.37
Value for money (0-100)		16.10
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1493 MHz	1072 MHz
Core clock speed	1303 MHz	993 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	28 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance	23.89 GFLOPS
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance	11.94 GFLOPS
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance	764.4 GFLOPS
Pipelines	384	512
Pixel fill rate	23.89 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate	23.89 GTexel/s	31.78 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	1800 million	40 Watt
Floating-point performance		1,017 gflops
Transistor count		1,870 million
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
Multi monitor support
Display Port		1.2
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Height	PCIe 3.0 x16
Laptop size	large	large
Supplementary power connectors	None	None
Interface		MXM-A (3.0)
API support
DirectX	12.1	12
OpenCL	1.2
OpenGL	4.6	4.5
Shader Model	6.4	5.0
Vulkan
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	2 GB / 4 GB
Memory bandwidth	40.10 GB/s	80 GB / s
Memory bus width	64 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	6000 MHz	5012 MHz
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Shared memory		0
Technologies
Multi Monitor
3D Vision Pro
Mosaic
nView Display Management
Optimus