NVIDIA Quadro P5200 vs AMD Radeon HD 8770 OEM
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro P5200 and AMD Radeon HD 8770 OEM videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P5200
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 5 month(s) later
- Around 25% higher core clock speed: 1316 MHz vs 1050 MHz
- 4751.7x more texture fill rate: 279.4 GTexel/s vs 58.8 GTexel / s
- 2.9x more pipelines: 2560 vs 896
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 16 nm vs 28 nm
- 16x more maximum memory size: 16 GB vs 1 GB
- 3.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 15910 vs 4551
- 3.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 15910 vs 4551
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 21 February 2018 vs 2 September 2013 |
| Core clock speed | 1316 MHz vs 1050 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 279.4 GTexel/s vs 58.8 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 2560 vs 896 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm vs 28 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 16 GB vs 1 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 15910 vs 4551 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 15910 vs 4551 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 8770 OEM
- Around 18% lower typical power consumption: 85 Watt vs 100 Watt
- 3.3x more memory clock speed: 6000 MHz vs 1800 MHz (7200 MHz effective)
- Around 85% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 6886 vs 3719
- Around 85% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 6886 vs 3719
- 5.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 17482 vs 3357
- 5.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 17482 vs 3357
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 85 Watt vs 100 Watt |
| Memory clock speed | 6000 MHz vs 1800 MHz (7200 MHz effective) |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 6886 vs 3719 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 6886 vs 3719 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 17482 vs 3357 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 17482 vs 3357 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro P5200
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 8770 OEM
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA Quadro P5200 | AMD Radeon HD 8770 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 38994 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 15910 | 4551 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 15910 | 4551 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3719 | 6886 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3719 | 6886 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 | 17482 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 | 17482 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 6252 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA Quadro P5200 | AMD Radeon HD 8770 OEM | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Pascal | GCN 2.0 |
| Code name | GP104 | Bonaire |
| Launch date | 21 February 2018 | 2 September 2013 |
| Place in performance rating | 274 | 277 |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1569 MHz | |
| Core clock speed | 1316 MHz | 1050 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm | 28 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 279.4 GFLOPS | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 139.7 GFLOPS | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 8.940 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 2560 | 896 |
| Pixel fill rate | 111.7 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 279.4 GTexel/s | 58.8 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt | 85 Watt |
| Transistor count | 7200 million | 2,080 million |
| Floating-point performance | 1,882 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Laptop size | Large | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
| Length | 183 mm | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (12_0) |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 16 GB | 1 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 230.4 GB/s | 96 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz (7200 MHz effective) | 6000 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA Quadro P5200 with others
NVIDIAQuadro P5200 vs
AMDRadeon HD 6610M
NVIDIAQuadro P5200 vs
AMDRadeon HD 8770 OEM
NVIDIAQuadro P5200 vs
NVIDIAQuadro P3200 Max-Q
NVIDIAQuadro P5200 vs
NVIDIATesla V100 SXM2 32 GB
NVIDIAQuadro P5200 vs
NVIDIATesla T4
NVIDIAQuadro P5200 vs
NVIDIARTX A2000 Mobile
