NVIDIA Quadro P5200 vs AMD Radeon HD 8770 OEM
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro P5200 and AMD Radeon HD 8770 OEM videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P5200
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 5 month(s) later
- Around 25% higher core clock speed: 1316 MHz vs 1050 MHz
- 4751.7x more texture fill rate: 279.4 GTexel/s vs 58.8 GTexel / s
- 2.9x more pipelines: 2560 vs 896
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 16 nm vs 28 nm
- 16x more maximum memory size: 16 GB vs 1 GB
- 3.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 15910 vs 4551
- 3.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 15910 vs 4551
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 21 February 2018 vs 2 September 2013 |
| Core clock speed | 1316 MHz vs 1050 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 279.4 GTexel/s vs 58.8 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 2560 vs 896 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm vs 28 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 16 GB vs 1 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 15910 vs 4551 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 15910 vs 4551 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 8770 OEM
- Around 18% lower typical power consumption: 85 Watt vs 100 Watt
- 3.3x more memory clock speed: 6000 MHz vs 1800 MHz (7200 MHz effective)
- Around 85% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 6886 vs 3719
- Around 85% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 6886 vs 3719
- 5.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 17482 vs 3357
- 5.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 17482 vs 3357
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 85 Watt vs 100 Watt |
| Memory clock speed | 6000 MHz vs 1800 MHz (7200 MHz effective) |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 6886 vs 3719 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 6886 vs 3719 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 17482 vs 3357 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 17482 vs 3357 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro P5200
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 8770 OEM
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA Quadro P5200 | AMD Radeon HD 8770 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 39352 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 15910 | 4551 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 15910 | 4551 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3719 | 6886 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3719 | 6886 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 | 17482 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 | 17482 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 6252 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA Quadro P5200 | AMD Radeon HD 8770 OEM | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Pascal | GCN 2.0 |
| Code name | GP104 | Bonaire |
| Launch date | 21 February 2018 | 2 September 2013 |
| Place in performance rating | 268 | 271 |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1569 MHz | |
| Core clock speed | 1316 MHz | 1050 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm | 28 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 279.4 GFLOPS | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 139.7 GFLOPS | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 8.940 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 2560 | 896 |
| Pixel fill rate | 111.7 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 279.4 GTexel/s | 58.8 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt | 85 Watt |
| Transistor count | 7200 million | 2,080 million |
| Floating-point performance | 1,882 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Laptop size | Large | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
| Length | 183 mm | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (12_0) |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 16 GB | 1 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 230.4 GB/s | 96 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz (7200 MHz effective) | 6000 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA Quadro P5200 with others
NVIDIAQuadro P5200 vs
AMDRadeon HD 8770 OEM
NVIDIAQuadro P5200 vs
AMDRadeon R7 M380
NVIDIAQuadro P5200 vs
AMDRadeon R9 390X
NVIDIAQuadro P5200 vs
AMDRadeon R9 Fury
NVIDIAQuadro P5200 vs
NVIDIATesla T4
NVIDIAQuadro P5200 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1650 Ti
