NVIDIA Quadro P620 vs Intel UHD Graphics 630

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro P620 and Intel UHD Graphics 630 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P620

• Videocard is newer: launch date 5 month(s) later
• 3.6x more core clock speed: 1266 MHz vs 350 MHz
• Around 13% higher boost clock speed: 1354 MHz vs 1200 MHz
• Around 62% higher texture fill rate: 46.56 GTexel / s vs 28.8 GTexel / s
• 21.3x more pipelines: 512 vs 24
• 3.2x better floating-point performance: 1,490 gflops vs 460.8 gflops
• 2.9x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3626 vs 1242
• Around 85% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 558 vs 301
• 2.7x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 12475 vs 4672
• Around 57% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 43.877 vs 27.89
• 2.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 773.248 vs 340.911
• Around 73% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.082 vs 1.785
• 2.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 53.425 vs 20.414
• 6.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 184.343 vs 29.514
• Around 91% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3575 vs 1870
• 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3881 vs 1596
• 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 6631 vs 3309
• Around 91% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3575 vs 1870
• 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3881 vs 1596
• 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 6631 vs 3309

Reasons to consider the Intel UHD Graphics 630

• 2.7x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 40 Watt

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro P620
GPU 2: Intel UHD Graphics 630

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	3626 1242
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	558 301
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	12475 4672
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	43.877 27.89
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	773.248 340.911
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3.082 1.785
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	53.425 20.414
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	184.343 29.514
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3575 1870
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3881 1596
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	6631 3309
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3575 1870
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3881 1596
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	6631 3309

Compare specifications (specs)