NVIDIA Quadro P620 versus Intel UHD Graphics 630
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA Quadro P620 and Intel UHD Graphics 630 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro P620
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 5 mois plus tard
- 3.6x plus de vitesse du noyau: 1266 MHz versus 350 MHz
- Environ 13% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1354 MHz versus 1200 MHz
- Environ 62% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 46.56 GTexel / s versus 28.8 GTexel / s
- 21.3x plus de pipelines: 512 versus 24
- 3.2x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 1,490 gflops versus 460.8 gflops
- 3x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 3670 versus 1237
- Environ 84% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 549 versus 299
- 2.7x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 12475 versus 4657
- Environ 59% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 43.877 versus 27.517
- 2.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 773.248 versus 354.254
- Environ 71% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.082 versus 1.807
- 2.6x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 53.425 versus 20.323
- 6.3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 184.343 versus 29.327
- Environ 91% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3575 versus 1870
- 2.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3881 versus 1596
- 2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 6631 versus 3309
- Environ 91% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3575 versus 1870
- 2.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3881 versus 1596
- 2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 6631 versus 3309
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 1 February 2018 versus 1 September 2017 |
Vitesse du noyau | 1266 MHz versus 350 MHz |
Vitesse augmenté | 1354 MHz versus 1200 MHz |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 46.56 GTexel / s versus 28.8 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 512 versus 24 |
Performance á point flottant | 1,490 gflops versus 460.8 gflops |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3670 versus 1237 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 549 versus 299 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 12475 versus 4657 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 43.877 versus 27.517 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 773.248 versus 354.254 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.082 versus 1.807 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 53.425 versus 20.323 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 184.343 versus 29.327 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3575 versus 1870 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3881 versus 1596 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 6631 versus 3309 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3575 versus 1870 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3881 versus 1596 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 6631 versus 3309 |
Raisons pour considerer le Intel UHD Graphics 630
- 2.7x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 15 Watt versus 40 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt versus 40 Watt |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro P620
GPU 2: Intel UHD Graphics 630
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA Quadro P620 | Intel UHD Graphics 630 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3670 | 1237 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 549 | 299 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 12475 | 4657 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 43.877 | 27.517 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 773.248 | 354.254 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.082 | 1.807 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 53.425 | 20.323 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 184.343 | 29.327 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3575 | 1870 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3881 | 1596 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 6631 | 3309 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3575 | 1870 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3881 | 1596 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 6631 | 3309 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 68 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA Quadro P620 | Intel UHD Graphics 630 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Pascal | Generation 9.5 |
Nom de code | GP107 | Coffee Lake GT2 |
Date de sortie | 1 February 2018 | 1 September 2017 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 583 | 1234 |
Prix maintenant | $176.99 | |
Genre | Workstation | Desktop |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 25.53 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1354 MHz | 1200 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 1266 MHz | 350 MHz |
Performance á point flottant | 1,490 gflops | 460.8 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 14 nm |
Pipelines | 512 | 24 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 46.56 GTexel / s | 28.8 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 40 Watt | 15 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 3,300 million | 189 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | 4x mini-DisplayPort | No outputs |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x1 |
Longeur | 145 mm | |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 2 GB | |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 64.19 GB / s | |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 Bit | 64 / 128 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 5012 MHz | |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | |
Mémoire partagé | 1 | |
Technologies |
||
Quick Sync |