NVIDIA Quadro P620 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 710
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro P620 and NVIDIA GeForce GT 710 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P620
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 10 month(s) later
- Around 33% higher core clock speed: 1266 MHz vs 954 MHz
- 3.1x more texture fill rate: 46.56 GTexel / s vs 15.26 GTexel / s
- 2.7x more pipelines: 512 vs 192
- 4.1x better floating-point performance: 1,490 gflops vs 366.3 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 5012x more memory clock speed: 5012 MHz vs 1.8 GB/s
- 5.9x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3670 vs 623
- 2.6x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 549 vs 212
- 6.4x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 12475 vs 1946
- 6.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 43.877 vs 6.705
- 7.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 773.248 vs 100.391
- 7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.082 vs 0.441
- 6.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 53.425 vs 8.146
- 8.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 184.343 vs 20.64
- 3.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3575 vs 977
- 2.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3881 vs 1494
- 3.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 6631 vs 1833
- 3.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3575 vs 977
- 2.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3881 vs 1494
- 3.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 6631 vs 1833
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 1 February 2018 vs 27 March 2014 |
Core clock speed | 1266 MHz vs 954 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 46.56 GTexel / s vs 15.26 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 512 vs 192 |
Floating-point performance | 1,490 gflops vs 366.3 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz vs 1.8 GB/s |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3670 vs 623 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 549 vs 212 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 12475 vs 1946 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 43.877 vs 6.705 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 773.248 vs 100.391 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.082 vs 0.441 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 53.425 vs 8.146 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 184.343 vs 20.64 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3575 vs 977 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3881 vs 1494 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 6631 vs 1833 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3575 vs 977 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3881 vs 1494 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 6631 vs 1833 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 710
- 2.1x lower typical power consumption: 19 Watt vs 40 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 19 Watt vs 40 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro P620
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 710
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Quadro P620 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 710 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3670 | 623 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 549 | 212 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 12475 | 1946 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 43.877 | 6.705 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 773.248 | 100.391 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.082 | 0.441 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 53.425 | 8.146 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 184.343 | 20.64 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3575 | 977 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3881 | 1494 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 6631 | 1833 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3575 | 977 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3881 | 1494 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 6631 | 1833 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 192 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Quadro P620 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 710 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Pascal | Kepler 2.0 |
Code name | GP107 | GK208B |
Launch date | 1 February 2018 | 27 March 2014 |
Place in performance rating | 583 | 1488 |
Price now | $176.99 | $34.99 |
Type | Workstation | Desktop |
Value for money (0-100) | 25.53 | 23.15 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $34.99 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1354 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 1266 MHz | 954 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 1,490 gflops | 366.3 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 512 | 192 |
Texture fill rate | 46.56 GTexel / s | 15.26 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 40 Watt | 19 Watt |
Transistor count | 3,300 million | 292 million |
CUDA cores | 192 | |
Maximum GPU temperature | 95 °C | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 4x mini-DisplayPort | Dual Link DVI-DHDMIVGA, 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x8 |
Length | 145 mm | 5.7" (14.5 cm) |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
Bus support | PCI Express 2.0 | |
Height | 2.713" (6.9 cm) | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 64.19 GB / s | 14.4 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz | 1.8 GB/s |
Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3 |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
Adaptive VSync | ||
CUDA | ||
FXAA | ||
PhysX | ||
PureVideo |