NVIDIA Quadro P620 versus NVIDIA GeForce GT 710
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA Quadro P620 and NVIDIA GeForce GT 710 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro P620
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 3 ans 10 mois plus tard
- Environ 33% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1266 MHz versus 954 MHz
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 46.56 GTexel / s versus 15.26 GTexel / s
- 2.7x plus de pipelines: 512 versus 192
- 4.1x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 1,490 gflops versus 366.3 gflops
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 14 nm versus 28 nm
- 5012x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 5012 MHz versus 1.8 GB/s
- 5.9x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 3670 versus 623
- 2.6x meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 549 versus 212
- 6.4x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 12475 versus 1946
- 6.5x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 43.877 versus 6.705
- 7.7x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 773.248 versus 100.391
- 7x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.082 versus 0.441
- 6.6x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 53.425 versus 8.146
- 8.9x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 184.343 versus 20.64
- 3.7x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3575 versus 977
- 2.6x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3881 versus 1494
- 3.6x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 6631 versus 1833
- 3.7x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3575 versus 977
- 2.6x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3881 versus 1494
- 3.6x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 6631 versus 1833
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 1 February 2018 versus 27 March 2014 |
Vitesse du noyau | 1266 MHz versus 954 MHz |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 46.56 GTexel / s versus 15.26 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 512 versus 192 |
Performance á point flottant | 1,490 gflops versus 366.3 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 14 nm versus 28 nm |
Vitesse de mémoire | 5012 MHz versus 1.8 GB/s |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3670 versus 623 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 549 versus 212 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 12475 versus 1946 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 43.877 versus 6.705 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 773.248 versus 100.391 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.082 versus 0.441 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 53.425 versus 8.146 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 184.343 versus 20.64 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3575 versus 977 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3881 versus 1494 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 6631 versus 1833 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3575 versus 977 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3881 versus 1494 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 6631 versus 1833 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GT 710
- 2.1x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 19 Watt versus 40 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 19 Watt versus 40 Watt |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro P620
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 710
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA Quadro P620 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 710 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3670 | 623 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 549 | 212 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 12475 | 1946 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 43.877 | 6.705 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 773.248 | 100.391 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.082 | 0.441 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 53.425 | 8.146 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 184.343 | 20.64 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3575 | 977 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3881 | 1494 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 6631 | 1833 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3575 | 977 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3881 | 1494 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 6631 | 1833 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 192 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA Quadro P620 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 710 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Pascal | Kepler 2.0 |
Nom de code | GP107 | GK208B |
Date de sortie | 1 February 2018 | 27 March 2014 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 583 | 1488 |
Prix maintenant | $176.99 | $34.99 |
Genre | Workstation | Desktop |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 25.53 | 23.15 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $34.99 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1354 MHz | |
Vitesse du noyau | 1266 MHz | 954 MHz |
Performance á point flottant | 1,490 gflops | 366.3 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 512 | 192 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 46.56 GTexel / s | 15.26 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 40 Watt | 19 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 3,300 million | 292 million |
Noyaux CUDA | 192 | |
Température maximale du GPU | 95 °C | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | 4x mini-DisplayPort | Dual Link DVI-DHDMIVGA, 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
Contribution d’audio pour HDMI | Internal | |
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Résolution VGA maximale | 2048x1536 | |
Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x8 |
Longeur | 145 mm | 5.7" (14.5 cm) |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | None |
Soutien de bus | PCI Express 2.0 | |
Hauteur | 2.713" (6.9 cm) | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 2 GB | 2 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 64.19 GB / s | 14.4 GB / s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 Bit | 64 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 5012 MHz | 1.8 GB/s |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | DDR3 |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
Adaptive VSync | ||
CUDA | ||
FXAA | ||
PhysX | ||
PureVideo |