NVIDIA Quadro P620 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro P620 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P620

• Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 11 month(s) later
• Around 24% higher core clock speed: 1266 MHz vs 1020 MHz
• Around 25% higher boost clock speed: 1354 MHz vs 1085 MHz
• Around 7% higher texture fill rate: 46.56 GTexel / s vs 43.4 GTexel / s
• Around 7% better floating-point performance: 1,490 gflops vs 1,389 gflops
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
• Around 50% lower typical power consumption: 40 Watt vs 60 Watt
• 1002.4x more memory clock speed: 5012 MHz vs 5.4 GB/s
• Around 5% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 549 vs 521
• Around 8% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 12475 vs 11526
• Around 3% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 43.877 vs 42.463
• Around 20% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 773.248 vs 642.715
• Around 5% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.082 vs 2.933
• 2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 53.425 vs 26.532
• Around 38% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 184.343 vs 133.458
• Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3881 vs 3683
• Around 99% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 6631 vs 3329
• Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3881 vs 3683
• Around 99% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 6631 vs 3329

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti

• Around 25% higher pipelines: 640 vs 512
• Around 6% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3901 vs 3670
• Around 35% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4843 vs 3575
• Around 35% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4843 vs 3575

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro P620
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	3670 3901
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	549 521
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	12475 11526
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	43.877 42.463
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	773.248 642.715
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3.082 2.933
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	53.425 26.532
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	184.343 133.458
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3575 4843
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3881 3683
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	6631 3329
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3575 4843
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3881 3683
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	6631 3329

Compare specifications (specs)