NVIDIA Quadro P620 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro P620 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P620

• Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 7 month(s) later
• Around 29% higher core clock speed: 1266 MHz vs 980 MHz
• Around 31% higher boost clock speed: 1354 MHz vs 1033 MHz
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
• 4.3x lower typical power consumption: 40 Watt vs 170 Watt
• Around 3% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 545 vs 529
• Around 17% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 43.877 vs 37.505
• Around 32% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 53.425 vs 40.457
• 2.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 184.343 vs 84.186
• Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3881 vs 3718
• Around 98% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 6631 vs 3357
• Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3881 vs 3718
• Around 98% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 6631 vs 3357

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760

• 2x more texture fill rate: 94.1 billion / sec vs 46.56 GTexel / s
• 2.3x more pipelines: 1152 vs 512
• Around 60% better floating-point performance: 2,378 gflops vs 1,490 gflops
• Around 20% higher memory clock speed: 6008 MHz vs 5012 MHz
• Around 32% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 4794 vs 3645
• Around 15% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 14286 vs 12475
• Around 12% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 864.402 vs 773.248
• Around 94% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 6927 vs 3575
• Around 94% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 6927 vs 3575

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro P620
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	3645 4794
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	545 529
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	12475 14286
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	43.877 37.505
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	773.248 864.402
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3.082 3.09
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	53.425 40.457
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	184.343 84.186
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3575 6927
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3881 3718
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	6631 3357
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3575 6927
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3881 3718
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	6631 3357

Compare specifications (specs)