NVIDIA Quadro P620 vs NVIDIA Quadro K1200

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro P620 and NVIDIA Quadro K1200 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P620

• Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 0 month(s) later
• Around 20% higher core clock speed: 1266 MHz vs 1058 MHz
• Around 20% higher boost clock speed: 1354 MHz vs 1124 MHz
• Around 29% higher texture fill rate: 46.56 GTexel / s vs 35.97 GTexel / s
• Around 29% better floating-point performance: 1,490 gflops vs 1,151 gflops
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
• Around 13% lower typical power consumption: 40 Watt vs 45 Watt
• Around 24% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3670 vs 2952
• Around 41% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 12475 vs 8820
• Around 37% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 43.877 vs 31.949
• Around 66% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 773.248 vs 466.139
• Around 17% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.082 vs 2.629
• 2.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 53.425 vs 25.411
• Around 57% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 184.343 vs 117.722
• 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3881 vs 1721
• 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 6631 vs 3288
• 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3881 vs 1721
• 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 6631 vs 3288

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K1200

• 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
• Around 5% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 578 vs 549
• Around 14% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4080 vs 3575
• Around 14% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4080 vs 3575

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro P620
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro K1200

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	3670 2952
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	549 578
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	12475 8820
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	43.877 31.949
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	773.248 466.139
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3.082 2.629
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	53.425 25.411
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	184.343 117.722
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3575 4080
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3881 1721
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	6631 3288
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3575 4080
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3881 1721
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	6631 3288

Compare specifications (specs)