NVIDIA Quadro P620 vs NVIDIA Quadro K4000

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro P620 and NVIDIA Quadro K4000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P620

• Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 11 month(s) later
• Around 56% higher core clock speed: 1266 MHz vs 810 MHz
• Around 20% better floating-point performance: 1,490 gflops vs 1,244 gflops
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
• 2x lower typical power consumption: 40 Watt vs 80 Watt
• Around 35% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3670 vs 2721
• Around 29% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 549 vs 424
• Around 87% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 12475 vs 6674
• 2.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 43.877 vs 18.462
• Around 81% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 773.248 vs 427.88
• Around 62% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.082 vs 1.899
• 2.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 53.425 vs 23.742
• 3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 184.343 vs 61.965
• Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3881 vs 3651
• 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 6631 vs 3321
• Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3881 vs 3651
• 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 6631 vs 3321

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K4000

• Around 11% higher texture fill rate: 51.84 GTexel / s vs 46.56 GTexel / s
• Around 50% higher pipelines: 768 vs 512
• Around 50% higher maximum memory size: 3 GB vs 2 GB
• Around 12% higher memory clock speed: 5616 MHz vs 5012 MHz
• Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3798 vs 3575
• Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3798 vs 3575

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro P620
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro K4000

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	3670 2721
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	549 424
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	12475 6674
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	43.877 18.462
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	773.248 427.88
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3.082 1.899
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	53.425 23.742
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	184.343 61.965
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3575 3798
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3881 3651
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	6631 3321
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3575 3798
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3881 3651
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	6631 3321

Compare specifications (specs)