NVIDIA Quadro P620 vs NVIDIA Quadro P1000

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro P620 and NVIDIA Quadro P1000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P620

• Videocard is newer: launch date 11 month(s) later
• Around 18% lower typical power consumption: 40 Watt vs 47 Watt
• Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3881 vs 3702
• Around 98% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 6631 vs 3348
• Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3881 vs 3702
• Around 98% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 6631 vs 3348

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P1000

• Around 9% higher boost clock speed: 1480 MHz vs 1354 MHz
• Around 27% higher texture fill rate: 59.2 GTexel / s vs 46.56 GTexel / s
• Around 27% better floating-point performance: 1,894 gflops vs 1,490 gflops
• 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
• Around 23% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 4500 vs 3670
• Around 7% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 590 vs 549
• Around 26% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 15667 vs 12475
• Around 64% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 71.86 vs 43.877
• Around 8% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 832.248 vs 773.248
• Around 31% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 4.039 vs 3.082
• Around 22% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 65.117 vs 53.425
• Around 33% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 245.081 vs 184.343
• Around 90% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 6796 vs 3575
• Around 90% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 6796 vs 3575

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro P620
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro P1000

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	3670 4500
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	549 590
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	12475 15667
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	43.877 71.86
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	773.248 832.248
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3.082 4.039
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	53.425 65.117
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	184.343 245.081
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3575 6796
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3881 3702
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	6631 3348
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3575 6796
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3881 3702
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	6631 3348

Compare specifications (specs)