NVIDIA Quadro P620 vs NVIDIA Quadro P400

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro P620 and NVIDIA Quadro P400 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P620

• Videocard is newer: launch date 11 month(s) later
• Around 3% higher core clock speed: 1266 MHz vs 1228 MHz
• Around 8% higher boost clock speed: 1354 MHz vs 1252 MHz
• 2.2x more texture fill rate: 46.56 GTexel / s vs 21.25 GTexel / s
• 2x more pipelines: 512 vs 256
• 2.2x better floating-point performance: 1,490 gflops vs 679.9 gflops
• Around 25% higher memory clock speed: 5012 MHz vs 4012 MHz
• 2.2x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3624 vs 1638
• Around 27% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 561 vs 442
• 4.1x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 12475 vs 3053
• 2.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 43.877 vs 20.138
• 2.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 773.248 vs 318.72
• 2.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.082 vs 1.391
• 2.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 53.425 vs 24.886
• 2.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 184.343 vs 84.858
• Around 32% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3575 vs 2709
• Around 35% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3881 vs 2875
• Around 99% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 6631 vs 3328
• Around 32% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3575 vs 2709
• Around 35% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3881 vs 2875
• Around 99% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 6631 vs 3328

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P400

• Around 33% lower typical power consumption: 30 Watt vs 40 Watt

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro P620
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro P400

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	3624 1638
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	561 442
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	12475 3053
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	43.877 20.138
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	773.248 318.72
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3.082 1.391
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	53.425 24.886
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	184.343 84.858
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3575 2709
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3881 2875
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	6631 3328
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3575 2709
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3881 2875
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	6631 3328

Compare specifications (specs)