NVIDIA Quadro P620 versus NVIDIA Quadro P400
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA Quadro P620 and NVIDIA Quadro P400 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro P620
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 11 mois plus tard
- Environ 3% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1266 MHz versus 1228 MHz
- Environ 8% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1354 MHz versus 1252 MHz
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 46.56 GTexel / s versus 21.25 GTexel / s
- 2x plus de pipelines: 512 versus 256
- 2.2x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 1,490 gflops versus 679.9 gflops
- Environ 25% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 5012 MHz versus 4012 MHz
- 2.2x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 3625 versus 1638
- Environ 26% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 559 versus 442
- 4.1x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 12475 versus 3053
- 2.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 43.877 versus 20.138
- 2.4x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 773.248 versus 318.72
- 2.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.082 versus 1.391
- 2.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 53.425 versus 24.886
- 2.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 184.343 versus 84.858
- Environ 32% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3575 versus 2709
- Environ 35% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3881 versus 2875
- Environ 99% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 6631 versus 3328
- Environ 32% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3575 versus 2709
- Environ 35% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3881 versus 2875
- Environ 99% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 6631 versus 3328
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 1 February 2018 versus 7 February 2017 |
Vitesse du noyau | 1266 MHz versus 1228 MHz |
Vitesse augmenté | 1354 MHz versus 1252 MHz |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 46.56 GTexel / s versus 21.25 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 512 versus 256 |
Performance á point flottant | 1,490 gflops versus 679.9 gflops |
Vitesse de mémoire | 5012 MHz versus 4012 MHz |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3625 versus 1638 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 559 versus 442 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 12475 versus 3053 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 43.877 versus 20.138 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 773.248 versus 318.72 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.082 versus 1.391 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 53.425 versus 24.886 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 184.343 versus 84.858 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3575 versus 2709 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3881 versus 2875 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 6631 versus 3328 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3575 versus 2709 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3881 versus 2875 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 6631 versus 3328 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro P400
- Environ 33% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 30 Watt versus 40 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt versus 40 Watt |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro P620
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro P400
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA Quadro P620 | NVIDIA Quadro P400 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3625 | 1638 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 559 | 442 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 12475 | 3053 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 43.877 | 20.138 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 773.248 | 318.72 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.082 | 1.391 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 53.425 | 24.886 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 184.343 | 84.858 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3575 | 2709 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3881 | 2875 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 6631 | 3328 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3575 | 2709 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3881 | 2875 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 6631 | 3328 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 617 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA Quadro P620 | NVIDIA Quadro P400 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Pascal | Pascal |
Nom de code | GP107 | GP107 |
Date de sortie | 1 February 2018 | 7 February 2017 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 578 | 992 |
Prix maintenant | $176.99 | $119.99 |
Genre | Workstation | Workstation |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 25.53 | 18.70 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $119.99 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1354 MHz | 1252 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 1266 MHz | 1228 MHz |
Performance á point flottant | 1,490 gflops | 679.9 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 14 nm |
Pipelines | 512 | 256 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 46.56 GTexel / s | 21.25 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 40 Watt | 30 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 3,300 million | 3,300 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | 4x mini-DisplayPort | 3x mini-DisplayPort |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Longeur | 145 mm | 145 mm |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | None |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 2 GB | 2 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 64.19 GB / s | 32.1 GB / s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 Bit | 64 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 5012 MHz | 4012 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |