NVIDIA Quadro P620 vs NVIDIA Quadro P400
Vergleichende Analyse von NVIDIA Quadro P620 und NVIDIA Quadro P400 Videokarten für alle bekannten Merkmale in den folgenden Kategorien: Essenzielles, Technische Info, Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse, Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen, API-Unterstützung, Speicher. Benchmark-Videokarten Leistungsanalyse: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Unterschiede
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der NVIDIA Quadro P620
- Grafikkarte ist neuer: Startdatum 11 Monat(e) später
- Etwa 3% höhere Kerntaktfrequenz:1266 MHz vs 1228 MHz
- Etwa 8% höhere Boost-Taktfrequenz: 1354 MHz vs 1252 MHz
- 2.2x mehr Texturfüllrate: 46.56 GTexel / s vs 21.25 GTexel / s
- 2x mehr Leitungssysteme: 512 vs 256
- 2.2x bessere Gleitkomma-Leistung: 1,490 gflops vs 679.9 gflops
- Etwa 25% höhere Speichertaktfrequenz: 5012 MHz vs 4012 MHz
- 2.2x bessere Leistung in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3670 vs 1651
- Etwa 26% bessere Leistung in PassMark - G2D Mark: 549 vs 435
- 4.1x bessere Leistung in Geekbench - OpenCL: 12475 vs 3053
- 2.2x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 43.877 vs 19.856
- 2.5x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 773.248 vs 309.824
- 2.2x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.082 vs 1.38
- 2.1x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 53.425 vs 25.011
- 2.2x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 184.343 vs 84.489
- Etwa 32% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3575 vs 2709
- Etwa 35% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3881 vs 2875
- Etwa 99% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 6631 vs 3328
- Etwa 32% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3575 vs 2709
- Etwa 35% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3881 vs 2875
- Etwa 99% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 6631 vs 3328
| Spezifikationen | |
| Startdatum | 1 February 2018 vs 7 February 2017 |
| Kerntaktfrequenz | 1266 MHz vs 1228 MHz |
| Boost-Taktfrequenz | 1354 MHz vs 1252 MHz |
| Texturfüllrate | 46.56 GTexel / s vs 21.25 GTexel / s |
| Leitungssysteme | 512 vs 256 |
| Gleitkomma-Leistung | 1,490 gflops vs 679.9 gflops |
| Speichertaktfrequenz | 5012 MHz vs 4012 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3670 vs 1651 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 549 vs 435 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 12475 vs 3053 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 43.877 vs 19.856 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 773.248 vs 309.824 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.082 vs 1.38 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 53.425 vs 25.011 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 184.343 vs 84.489 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3575 vs 2709 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3881 vs 2875 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 6631 vs 3328 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3575 vs 2709 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3881 vs 2875 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 6631 vs 3328 |
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der NVIDIA Quadro P400
- Etwa 33% geringere typische Leistungsaufnahme: 30 Watt vs 40 Watt
| Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 30 Watt vs 40 Watt |
Benchmarks vergleichen
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro P620
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro P400
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA Quadro P620 | NVIDIA Quadro P400 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3670 | 1651 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 549 | 435 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 12475 | 3053 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 43.877 | 19.856 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 773.248 | 309.824 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.082 | 1.38 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 53.425 | 25.011 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 184.343 | 84.489 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3575 | 2709 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3881 | 2875 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 6631 | 3328 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3575 | 2709 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3881 | 2875 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 6631 | 3328 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 617 |
Vergleichen Sie Spezifikationen
| NVIDIA Quadro P620 | NVIDIA Quadro P400 | |
|---|---|---|
Essenzielles |
||
| Architektur | Pascal | Pascal |
| Codename | GP107 | GP107 |
| Startdatum | 1 February 2018 | 7 February 2017 |
| Platz in der Leistungsbewertung | 583 | 983 |
| Jetzt kaufen | $176.99 | $119.99 |
| Typ | Workstation | Workstation |
| Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis (0-100) | 25.53 | 18.70 |
| Einführungspreis (MSRP) | $119.99 | |
Technische Info |
||
| Boost-Taktfrequenz | 1354 MHz | 1252 MHz |
| Kerntaktfrequenz | 1266 MHz | 1228 MHz |
| Gleitkomma-Leistung | 1,490 gflops | 679.9 gflops |
| Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Leitungssysteme | 512 | 256 |
| Texturfüllrate | 46.56 GTexel / s | 21.25 GTexel / s |
| Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 40 Watt | 30 Watt |
| Anzahl der Transistoren | 3,300 million | 3,300 million |
Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse |
||
| Display-Anschlüsse | 4x mini-DisplayPort | 3x mini-DisplayPort |
Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen |
||
| Schnittstelle | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Länge | 145 mm | 145 mm |
| Zusätzliche Leistungssteckverbinder | None | None |
API-Unterstützung |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Speicher |
||
| Maximale RAM-Belastung | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Speicherbandbreite | 64.19 GB / s | 32.1 GB / s |
| Breite des Speicherbusses | 128 Bit | 64 Bit |
| Speichertaktfrequenz | 5012 MHz | 4012 MHz |
| Speichertyp | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |

