NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q vs NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Mobile

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q and NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Mobile videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 3 month(s) later
  • 1807.9x more texture fill rate: 175.0 GTexel/s vs 96.8 GTexel / s
  • Around 80% higher pipelines: 2304 vs 1280
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 16 nm
  • Around 25% lower typical power consumption: 60 Watt vs 75 Watt
  • Around 99% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 68305 vs 34276
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 27 May 2019 vs 21 February 2018
Texture fill rate 175.0 GTexel/s vs 96.8 GTexel / s
Pipelines 2304 vs 1280
Manufacturing process technology 12 nm vs 16 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 60 Watt vs 75 Watt
Benchmarks
Geekbench - OpenCL 68305 vs 34276

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Mobile

  • 2.2x more core clock speed: 1328 MHz vs 600 MHz
  • Around 21% higher boost clock speed: 1476 MHz vs 1215 MHz
  • Around 7% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 8793 vs 8255
  • Around 34% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 456 vs 341
  • Around 28% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 12948 vs 10140
  • Around 28% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 12948 vs 10140
Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed 1328 MHz vs 600 MHz
Boost clock speed 1476 MHz vs 1215 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 8793 vs 8255
PassMark - G2D Mark 456 vs 341
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 12948 vs 10140
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3718 vs 3706
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3358 vs 3351
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 12948 vs 10140
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3718 vs 3706
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3358 vs 3351

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Mobile

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
8255
8793
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
341
456
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
68305
34276
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
10140
12948
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3706
3718
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3351
3358
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
10140
12948
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3706
3718
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3351
3358
Name NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Mobile
PassMark - G3D Mark 8255 8793
PassMark - G2D Mark 341 456
Geekbench - OpenCL 68305 34276
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 220.867
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 2046.214
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 16.026
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 94.532
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 645.647
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 10140 12948
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3706 3718
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3351 3358
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 10140 12948
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3706 3718
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3351 3358
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 0

Compare specifications (specs)

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Mobile

Essentials

Architecture Turing Pascal
Code name TU106 GP104
Launch date 27 May 2019 21 February 2018
Place in performance rating 337 336
Type Mobile workstation Workstation

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1215 MHz 1476 MHz
Core clock speed 600 MHz 1328 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 12 nm 16 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance 175.0 GFLOPS
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance 11.20 TFLOPS
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance 5.599 TFLOPS
Pipelines 2304 1280
Pixel fill rate 77.76 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate 175.0 GTexel/s 96.8 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 60 Watt 75 Watt
Transistor count 10800 million 7,200 million
Floating-point performance 3,098 gflops

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs No outputs

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 3.0 x16 MXM-B (3.0)
Supplementary power connectors None
Width IGP

API support

DirectX 12.1 12.0 (12_1)
OpenCL 1.2
OpenGL 4.6 4.6
Shader Model 6.4
Vulkan

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 6 GB 6 GB
Memory bandwidth 448 GB/s 168.3 GB / s
Memory bus width 256 bit 192 Bit
Memory type GDDR6 GDDR5
Memory clock speed 7012 MHz