NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 month(s) later
- Around 44% lower typical power consumption: 80 Watt vs 115 Watt
| Launch date | 27 May 2019 vs 29 January 2019 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 80 Watt vs 115 Watt |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
- Around 29% higher core clock speed: 1215 MHz vs 945 MHz
- Around 4% higher boost clock speed: 1440 MHz vs 1380 MHz
- Around 15% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 601 vs 522
- Around 11% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 12354 vs 11163
- Around 28% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 18604 vs 14496
- Around 28% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 18604 vs 14496
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8898 vs 3719
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8898 vs 3719
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 8029 vs 3361
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 8029 vs 3361
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1215 MHz vs 945 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1440 MHz vs 1380 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 601 vs 522 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 12354 vs 11163 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 18604 vs 14496 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 18604 vs 14496 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8898 vs 3719 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8898 vs 3719 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8029 vs 3361 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8029 vs 3361 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 522 | 601 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 11163 | 12354 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 64529 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 14496 | 18604 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 14496 | 18604 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3719 | 8898 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3719 | 8898 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3361 | 8029 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3361 | 8029 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 7453 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Turing | Turing |
| Code name | N19E-Q1 | TU106 |
| Launch date | 27 May 2019 | 29 January 2019 |
| Place in performance rating | 231 | 128 |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Laptop |
| Price now | $489.99 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 49.06 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1380 MHz | 1440 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 945 MHz | 1215 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 12 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 198.7 GFLOPS | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 12.72 TFLOPS | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 6.359 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 2304 | 2304 |
| Pixel fill rate | 88.32 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 198.7 GTexel/s | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 80 Watt | 115 Watt |
| Transistor count | 10800 million | 10,800 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| G-SYNC support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Laptop size | Large | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | |
| Memory bandwidth | 448 GB/s | |
| Memory bus width | 192 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz | 14000 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
Technologies |
||
| Multi Monitor | ||
| VR Ready | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 with others
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 3000 vs
NVIDIAQuadro M6000 24 GB
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 3000 vs
NVIDIATesla P40
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 3000 vs
NVIDIAQuadro P5000
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 3000 vs
AMDRadeon Pro Vega 48
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 3000 vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 3000 vs
AMDRadeon RX 6400
