NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 vs AMD Radeon Pro Vega 48

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 and AMD Radeon Pro Vega 48 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000

• Videocard is newer: launch date 2 month(s) later
• Around 6% higher boost clock speed: 1380 MHz vs 1300 MHz
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 14 nm
• 156.3x lower typical power consumption: 80 Watt vs 12500 million
• 17.8x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 786 MHz (1572 MHz effective)
• Around 19% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 64074 vs 53770
• Around 22% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 14496 vs 11925
• Around 22% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 14496 vs 11925

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro Vega 48

• Around 27% higher core clock speed: 1200 MHz vs 945 MHz
• Around 26% higher texture fill rate: 249.6 GTexel/s vs 198.7 GTexel/s
• Around 33% higher pipelines: 3072 vs 2304
• Around 33% higher maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 6 GB
• Around 53% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 784 vs 511
• Around 2% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 11300 vs 11130
• Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3947 vs 3719
• Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3947 vs 3719
• 3.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 10411 vs 3361
• 3.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 10411 vs 3361

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Pro Vega 48

PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	511 784
PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	11130 11300
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	64074 53770
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	14496 11925
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	14496 11925
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3719 3947
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3719 3947
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3361 10411
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3361 10411

Compare specifications (specs)