NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 8 month(s) later
  • 2.7x lower typical power consumption: 80 Watt vs 215 Watt
Launch date 27 May 2019 vs 20 September 2018
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 80 Watt vs 215 Watt

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080

  • Around 60% higher core clock speed: 1515 MHz vs 945 MHz
  • Around 24% higher boost clock speed: 1710 MHz vs 1380 MHz
  • Around 28% higher pipelines: 2944 vs 2304
  • Around 75% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 912 vs 522
  • Around 68% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 18811 vs 11176
  • Around 59% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 102535 vs 64407
  • Around 76% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 25500 vs 14496
  • Around 76% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 25500 vs 14496
  • Around 87% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 6966 vs 3719
  • Around 87% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 6966 vs 3719
  • Around 87% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 6293 vs 3361
  • Around 87% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 6293 vs 3361
Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed 1515 MHz vs 945 MHz
Boost clock speed 1710 MHz vs 1380 MHz
Pipelines 2944 vs 2304
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark 912 vs 522
PassMark - G3D Mark 18811 vs 11176
Geekbench - OpenCL 102535 vs 64407
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 25500 vs 14496
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 25500 vs 14496
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 6966 vs 3719
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 6966 vs 3719
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 6293 vs 3361
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 6293 vs 3361

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080

PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
522
912
PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
11176
18811
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
64407
102535
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
14496
25500
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
14496
25500
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3719
6966
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3719
6966
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3361
6293
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3361
6293
Name NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080
PassMark - G2D Mark 522 912
PassMark - G3D Mark 11176 18811
Geekbench - OpenCL 64407 102535
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 14496 25500
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 14496 25500
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3719 6966
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3719 6966
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3361 6293
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3361 6293
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 326.494
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 3938.377
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 31.684
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 159.275
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 1506.874
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 10970

Compare specifications (specs)

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080

Essentials

Architecture Turing Turing
Code name N19E-Q1 TU104
Launch date 27 May 2019 20 September 2018
Place in performance rating 232 98
Type Mobile workstation Desktop
Launch price (MSRP) $699
Price now $749.99
Value for money (0-100) 32.34

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1380 MHz 1710 MHz
Core clock speed 945 MHz 1515 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 12 nm 12 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance 198.7 GFLOPS
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance 12.72 TFLOPS
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance 6.359 TFLOPS
Pipelines 2304 2944
Pixel fill rate 88.32 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate 198.7 GTexel/s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 80 Watt 215 Watt
Transistor count 10800 million 13,600 million

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C
G-SYNC support

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x16
Laptop size Large
Supplementary power connectors None 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Length 267 mm

API support

DirectX 12.1 12.0 (12_1)
OpenCL 1.2
OpenGL 4.6 4.6
Shader Model 6.4
Vulkan

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 6 GB
Memory bandwidth 448 GB/s
Memory bus width 192 Bit 256 Bit
Memory clock speed 14000 MHz 14000 MHz
Memory type GDDR6 GDDR6

Technologies

Multi Monitor
VR Ready