NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 vs NVIDIA Quadro M5500 Mobile
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 and NVIDIA Quadro M5500 Mobile videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 1 month(s) later
- Around 10% higher core clock speed: 945 MHz vs 861 MHz
- Around 33% higher boost clock speed: 1380 MHz vs 1038 MHz
- 1495.1x more texture fill rate: 198.7 GTexel/s vs 132.9 GTexel / s
- Around 13% higher pipelines: 2304 vs 2048
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 28 nm
- Around 88% lower typical power consumption: 80 Watt vs 150 Watt
- 2x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 7012 MHz
- Around 41% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 11163 vs 7915
- Around 23% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 14496 vs 11804
- Around 23% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 14496 vs 11804
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3719 vs 3684
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3719 vs 3684
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 27 May 2019 vs 8 April 2016 |
| Core clock speed | 945 MHz vs 861 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1380 MHz vs 1038 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 198.7 GTexel/s vs 132.9 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 2304 vs 2048 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 80 Watt vs 150 Watt |
| Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz vs 7012 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 11163 vs 7915 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 14496 vs 11804 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 14496 vs 11804 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3719 vs 3684 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3719 vs 3684 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro M5500 Mobile
- Around 33% higher maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 6 GB
- Around 34% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 698 vs 522
- Around 25% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 4193 vs 3361
- Around 25% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 4193 vs 3361
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 6 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 698 vs 522 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 4193 vs 3361 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 4193 vs 3361 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro M5500 Mobile
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 | NVIDIA Quadro M5500 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 522 | 698 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 11163 | 7915 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 64529 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 14496 | 11804 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 14496 | 11804 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3719 | 3684 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3719 | 3684 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3361 | 4193 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3361 | 4193 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 | NVIDIA Quadro M5500 Mobile | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Turing | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Code name | N19E-Q1 | GM204 |
| Launch date | 27 May 2019 | 8 April 2016 |
| Place in performance rating | 231 | 239 |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Workstation |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1380 MHz | 1038 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 945 MHz | 861 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 28 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 198.7 GFLOPS | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 12.72 TFLOPS | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 6.359 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 2304 | 2048 |
| Pixel fill rate | 88.32 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 198.7 GTexel/s | 132.9 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 80 Watt | 150 Watt |
| Transistor count | 10800 million | 5,200 million |
| Floating-point performance | 4,252 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| G-SYNC support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Laptop size | Large | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 448 GB/s | 224.4 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 192 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz | 7012 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
| Multi Monitor | ||
| VR Ready | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 with others
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 3000 vs
NVIDIAQuadro M6000 24 GB
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 3000 vs
NVIDIATesla P40
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 3000 vs
NVIDIAQuadro P5000
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 3000 vs
AMDRadeon Pro Vega 48
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 3000 vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 3000 vs
AMDRadeon RX 6400
