NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 vs NVIDIA Quadro P620

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 and NVIDIA Quadro P620 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000

NVIDIA Quadro P620

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000

Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 3 month(s) later
Around 2% higher boost clock speed: 1380 MHz vs 1354 MHz
4267.6x more texture fill rate: 198.7 GTexel/s vs 46.56 GTexel / s
4.5x more pipelines: 2304 vs 512
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 14 nm
3x more maximum memory size: 6 GB vs 2 GB
2.8x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 5012 MHz
3x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 10967 vs 3670
5.1x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 63532 vs 12475
4.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 14496 vs 3575
4.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 14496 vs 3575

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	27 May 2019 vs 1 February 2018
Boost clock speed	1380 MHz vs 1354 MHz
Texture fill rate	198.7 GTexel/s vs 46.56 GTexel / s
Pipelines	2304 vs 512
Manufacturing process technology	12 nm vs 14 nm
Maximum memory size	6 GB vs 2 GB
Memory clock speed	14000 MHz vs 5012 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	10967 vs 3670
Geekbench - OpenCL	63532 vs 12475
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	14496 vs 3575
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	14496 vs 3575

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P620

Around 34% higher core clock speed: 1266 MHz vs 945 MHz
2x lower typical power consumption: 40 Watt vs 80 Watt
Around 10% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 549 vs 498
Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3881 vs 3719
Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3881 vs 3719
Around 97% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 6631 vs 3361
Around 97% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 6631 vs 3361

Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed	1266 MHz vs 945 MHz
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	40 Watt vs 80 Watt
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark	549 vs 498
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3881 vs 3719
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3881 vs 3719
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	6631 vs 3361
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	6631 vs 3361

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro P620

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

498

549

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

10967

3670

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

63532

12475

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

14496

3575

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

14496

3575

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3719

3881

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3719

3881

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3361

6631

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3361

6631

Name	NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000	NVIDIA Quadro P620
PassMark - G2D Mark	498	549
PassMark - G3D Mark	10967	3670
Geekbench - OpenCL	63532	12475
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	14496	3575
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	14496	3575
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3719	3881
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3719	3881
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3361	6631
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3361	6631
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)		43.877
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)		773.248
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)		3.082
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)		53.425
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)		184.343

Compare specifications (specs)

	NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000	NVIDIA Quadro P620
Essentials
Architecture	Turing	Pascal
Code name	N19E-Q1	GP107
Launch date	27 May 2019	1 February 2018
Place in performance rating	249	583
Type	Mobile workstation	Workstation
Price now		$176.99
Value for money (0-100)		25.53
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1380 MHz	1354 MHz
Core clock speed	945 MHz	1266 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	12 nm	14 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance	198.7 GFLOPS
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance	12.72 TFLOPS
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance	6.359 TFLOPS
Pipelines	2304	512
Pixel fill rate	88.32 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate	198.7 GTexel/s	46.56 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	80 Watt	40 Watt
Transistor count	10800 million	3,300 million
Floating-point performance		1,490 gflops
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	4x mini-DisplayPort
G-SYNC support
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Laptop size	Large
Supplementary power connectors	None	None
Length		145 mm
API support
DirectX	12.1	12.0 (12_1)
OpenCL	1.2
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Shader Model	6.4
Vulkan
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	6 GB	2 GB
Memory bandwidth	448 GB/s	64.19 GB / s
Memory bus width	192 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	14000 MHz	5012 MHz
Memory type	GDDR6	GDDR5
Technologies
Multi Monitor
VR Ready