NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 and NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000
- Videocard is newer: launch date 6 month(s) later
- 2x lower typical power consumption: 80 Watt vs 160 Watt
- 8.6x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 1625 MHz (13000 MHz effective)
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 27 May 2019 vs 13 November 2018 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 80 Watt vs 160 Watt |
| Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz vs 1625 MHz (13000 MHz effective) |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3719 vs 3714 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3719 vs 3714 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3361 vs 3359 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3361 vs 3359 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000
- Around 6% higher core clock speed: 1005 MHz vs 945 MHz
- Around 12% higher boost clock speed: 1545 MHz vs 1380 MHz
- Around 12% higher texture fill rate: 222.5 GTexel/s vs 198.7 GTexel/s
- Around 33% higher maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 6 GB
- Around 33% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 85570 vs 64529
- Around 39% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 20206 vs 14496
- Around 39% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 20206 vs 14496
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1005 MHz vs 945 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1545 MHz vs 1380 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 222.5 GTexel/s vs 198.7 GTexel/s |
| Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 6 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 85570 vs 64529 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20206 vs 14496 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20206 vs 14496 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 522 | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 11163 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 64529 | 85570 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 14496 | 20206 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 14496 | 20206 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3719 | 3714 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3719 | 3714 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3361 | 3359 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3361 | 3359 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 282.628 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3403.106 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 24.719 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 136.919 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1010.818 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 7856 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Turing | Turing |
| Code name | N19E-Q1 | TU104 |
| Launch date | 27 May 2019 | 13 November 2018 |
| Place in performance rating | 231 | 195 |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
| GCN generation | Quadro RTX | |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $899 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1380 MHz | 1545 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 945 MHz | 1005 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 12 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 198.7 GFLOPS | 222.5 GFLOPS |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 12.72 TFLOPS | 14.24 TFLOPS |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 6.359 TFLOPS | 7.119 TFLOPS |
| Pipelines | 2304 | 2304 |
| Pixel fill rate | 88.32 GPixel/s | 98.88 GPixel/s |
| Texture fill rate | 198.7 GTexel/s | 222.5 GTexel/s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 80 Watt | 160 Watt |
| Transistor count | 10800 million | 13600 million |
| Render output units | 64 | |
| Texture Units | 144 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C |
| G-SYNC support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Laptop size | Large | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 8-pin |
| Length | 9.5 inches (241 mm) | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.1 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | 6.4 |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 448 GB/s | 416.0 GB/s |
| Memory bus width | 192 Bit | 256 bit |
| Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz | 1625 MHz (13000 MHz effective) |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
Technologies |
||
| Multi Monitor | ||
| VR Ready | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 with others
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 3000 vs
NVIDIAQuadro M6000 24 GB
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 3000 vs
NVIDIATesla P40
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 3000 vs
NVIDIAQuadro P5000
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 3000 vs
AMDRadeon Pro Vega 48
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 3000 vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 3000 vs
AMDRadeon RX 6400
