NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile and AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile

AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile

Videocard is newer: launch date 9 month(s) later
Around 2% higher boost clock speed: 1560 MHz vs 1530 MHz
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 14 nm
2.1x lower typical power consumption: 110 Watt vs 230 Watt
Around 50% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 19529 vs 13044
Around 50% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 19529 vs 13044

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	27 May 2019 vs 13 August 2018
Boost clock speed	1560 MHz vs 1530 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	12 nm vs 14 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	110 Watt vs 230 Watt
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	19529 vs 13044
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	19529 vs 13044

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200

Around 8% higher core clock speed: 1200 MHz vs 1110 MHz
Around 14% higher memory clock speed: 2000 MHz vs 1750 MHz (14000 MHz effective)
Around 48% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 815 vs 551
Around 10% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 13932 vs 12627
Around 93% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 7164 vs 3715
Around 93% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 7164 vs 3715
9.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 30936 vs 3356
9.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 30936 vs 3356

Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed	1200 MHz vs 1110 MHz
Memory clock speed	2000 MHz vs 1750 MHz (14000 MHz effective)
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark	815 vs 551
PassMark - G3D Mark	13932 vs 12627
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	7164 vs 3715
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	7164 vs 3715
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	30936 vs 3356
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	30936 vs 3356

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

551

815

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

12627

13932

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

19529

13044

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

19529

13044

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3715

7164

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3715

7164

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3356

30936

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3356

30936

Name	NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile	AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	7438
PassMark - G2D Mark	551	815
PassMark - G3D Mark	12627	13932
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	19529	13044
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	19529	13044
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3715	7164
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3715	7164
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3356	30936
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3356	30936
Geekbench - OpenCL		69812
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)		171.616
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)		4031.404
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)		16.925
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)		247.788
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)		1195.863

Compare specifications (specs)

	NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile	AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200
Essentials
Architecture	Turing	GCN 5.0
Code name	TU104	Vega 10
Launch date	27 May 2019	13 August 2018
Place in performance rating	171	118
Type	Laptop	Workstation
Launch price (MSRP)		$999
Price now		$999
Value for money (0-100)		13.37
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1560 MHz	1530 MHz
Core clock speed	1110 MHz	1200 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	12 nm	14 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance	249.6 GFLOPS (1:32)
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance	15.97 TFLOPS (2:1)
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance	7.987 TFLOPS
Pipelines	2560
Pixel fill rate	99.84 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate	249.6 GTexel/s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	110 Watt	230 Watt
Transistor count	13600 million	12,500 million
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	4x mini-DisplayPort
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	None	1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Width	IGP
Length		267 mm
API support
DirectX	12.1	12.0 (12_1)
OpenCL	1.2
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Shader Model	6.5
Vulkan
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB
Memory bandwidth	448 GB/s
Memory bus width	256 bit
Memory clock speed	1750 MHz (14000 MHz effective)	2000 MHz
Memory type	GDDR6