NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile and NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile
- 2.2x more texture fill rate: 249.6 GTexel/s vs 114.2 GTexel/s
- 2.5x more pipelines: 2560 vs 1024
- 2x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 4 GB
- 2.2x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 7438 vs 3319
- Around 18% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 506 vs 430
- Around 63% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 11759 vs 7235
- 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 19529 vs 9313
- 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 19529 vs 9313
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Texture fill rate | 249.6 GTexel/s vs 114.2 GTexel/s |
| Pipelines | 2560 vs 1024 |
| Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 4 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 7438 vs 3319 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 506 vs 430 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 11759 vs 7235 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 19529 vs 9313 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 19529 vs 9313 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 vs 3698 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 vs 3698 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 vs 3353 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 vs 3353 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile
- Around 42% higher core clock speed: 1575 MHz vs 1110 MHz
- Around 14% higher boost clock speed: 1785 MHz vs 1560 MHz
- Around 83% lower typical power consumption: 60 Watt vs 110 Watt
- 4.6x more memory clock speed: 8000 MHz vs 1750 MHz (14000 MHz effective)
| Core clock speed | 1575 MHz vs 1110 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1785 MHz vs 1560 MHz |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 60 Watt vs 110 Watt |
| Memory clock speed | 8000 MHz vs 1750 MHz (14000 MHz effective) |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile | NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 7438 | 3319 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 506 | 430 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 11759 | 7235 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 19529 | 9313 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 19529 | 9313 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 | 3698 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 | 3698 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 | 3353 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 | 3353 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 38863 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile | NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Turing | Turing |
| Code name | TU104 | TU117 |
| Launch date | 27 May 2019 | 27 May 2019 |
| Place in performance rating | 171 | 362 |
| Type | Laptop | Mobile workstation |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1560 MHz | 1785 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 1110 MHz | 1575 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 12 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 249.6 GFLOPS (1:32) | 114.2 GFLOPS |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 15.97 TFLOPS (2:1) | 7.311 TFLOPS |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 7.987 TFLOPS | 3.656 TFLOPS |
| Pipelines | 2560 | 1024 |
| Pixel fill rate | 99.84 GPixel/s | 57.12 GPixel/s |
| Texture fill rate | 249.6 GTexel/s | 114.2 GTexel/s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 110 Watt | 60 Watt |
| Transistor count | 13600 million | 4700 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Width | IGP | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.1 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.5 | 6.4 |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 448 GB/s | 128.0 GB/s |
| Memory bus width | 256 bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz (14000 MHz effective) | 8000 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile with others
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 4000 Mobile vs
AMDRadeon R9 270 1024SP
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 4000 Mobile vs
NVIDIATesla P100 PCIe 12 GB
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 4000 Mobile vs
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 5000 Max-Q
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 4000 Mobile vs
NVIDIARTX A3000 Mobile
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 4000 Mobile vs
AMDRadeon RX 6600M
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 4000 Mobile vs
NVIDIARTX A1000 Mobile 6GB
