NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 vs AMD FirePro W9100
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 and AMD FirePro W9100 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 7 month(s) later
- Around 8% higher core clock speed: 1005 MHz vs 930 MHz
- 1359.2x more texture fill rate: 222.5 GTexel/s vs 163.7 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 28 nm
- 4.7x lower typical power consumption: 160 Watt vs 750 Watt
- Around 99% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 85474 vs 43046
- 2.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 282.628 vs 106.585
- Around 81% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 3403.106 vs 1878.403
- 2.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 24.719 vs 9.751
- Around 67% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 136.919 vs 82.208
- Around 98% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1010.818 vs 511.115
- 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 20206 vs 9143
- 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 20206 vs 9143
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 13 November 2018 vs 26 March 2014 |
| Core clock speed | 1005 MHz vs 930 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 222.5 GTexel/s vs 163.7 GTexel / s |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 160 Watt vs 750 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 85474 vs 43046 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 282.628 vs 106.585 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3403.106 vs 1878.403 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 24.719 vs 9.751 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 136.919 vs 82.208 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1010.818 vs 511.115 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20206 vs 9143 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20206 vs 9143 |
Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro W9100
- Around 22% higher pipelines: 2816 vs 2304
- 2x more maximum memory size: 16 GB vs 8 GB
- 3.1x more memory clock speed: 5000 MHz vs 1625 MHz (13000 MHz effective)
- 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8219 vs 3714
- 9.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 32085 vs 3359
- 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8219 vs 3714
- 9.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 32085 vs 3359
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Pipelines | 2816 vs 2304 |
| Maximum memory size | 16 GB vs 8 GB |
| Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz vs 1625 MHz (13000 MHz effective) |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8219 vs 3714 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 32085 vs 3359 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8219 vs 3714 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 32085 vs 3359 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000
GPU 2: AMD FirePro W9100
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 | AMD FirePro W9100 |
|---|---|---|
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 85474 | 43046 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 282.628 | 106.585 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3403.106 | 1878.403 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 24.719 | 9.751 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 136.919 | 82.208 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1010.818 | 511.115 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20206 | 9143 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3714 | 8219 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 | 32085 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20206 | 9143 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3714 | 8219 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 | 32085 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 7856 | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 7987 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 752 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 | AMD FirePro W9100 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Turing | GCN 2.0 |
| Code name | TU104 | Hawaii |
| GCN generation | Quadro RTX | |
| Launch date | 13 November 2018 | 26 March 2014 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $899 | |
| Place in performance rating | 193 | 189 |
| Type | Desktop | Workstation |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1545 MHz | |
| Core clock speed | 1005 MHz | 930 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 28 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 222.5 GFLOPS | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 14.24 TFLOPS | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 7.119 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 2304 | 2816 |
| Pixel fill rate | 98.88 GPixel/s | |
| Render output units | 64 | |
| Texture fill rate | 222.5 GTexel/s | 163.7 GTexel / s |
| Texture Units | 144 | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 160 Watt | 750 Watt |
| Transistor count | 13600 million | 6,200 million |
| Floating-point performance | 5,238 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C | 6x mini-DisplayPort, 1x S-Video |
| Dual-link DVI support | ||
| HD сomponent video output | ||
| StereoOutput3D | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | 9.5 inches (241 mm) | 275 mm |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Form factor | Full Height / Full Length | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (12_0) |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 16 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 416.0 GB/s | 320 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 256 bit | 512 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1625 MHz (13000 MHz effective) | 5000 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 with others
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 4000 vs
AMDRadeon PRO WX 9100
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 4000 vs
AMDRadeon Pro W5700
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 4000 vs
AMDRadeon RX 5600 XT
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 4000 vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3050 Mobile
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 4000 vs
AMDRadeon 780M
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 4000 vs
IntelArc Pro A60
