NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 versus AMD Radeon PRO WX 9100
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 and AMD Radeon PRO WX 9100 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 4 mois plus tard
- Environ 3% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1545 MHz versus 1500 MHz
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 222.5 GTexel/s versus 384.0 GTexel / s
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 12 nm versus 14 nm
- Environ 44% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 160 Watt versus 230 Watt
- Environ 31% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 85799 versus 65451
- Environ 33% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 232.933 versus 174.714
- Environ 44% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 24.872 versus 17.305
- Environ 46% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 20206 versus 13848
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3714 versus 3680
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3359 versus 3336
- Environ 46% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 20206 versus 13848
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3714 versus 3680
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3359 versus 3336
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 13 November 2018 versus 10 July 2017 |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1545 MHz versus 1500 MHz |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 222.5 GTexel/s versus 384.0 GTexel / s |
| Processus de fabrication | 12 nm versus 14 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 160 Watt versus 230 Watt |
| Référence | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 85799 versus 65451 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 232.933 versus 174.714 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 24.872 versus 17.305 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20206 versus 13848 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3714 versus 3680 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 versus 3336 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20206 versus 13848 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3714 versus 3680 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 versus 3336 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon PRO WX 9100
- Environ 19% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1200 MHz versus 1005 MHz
- Environ 78% de pipelines plus haut: 4096 versus 2304
- 2x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 16 GB versus 8 GB
- Environ 16% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 1890 MHz versus 1625 MHz (13000 MHz effective)
- Environ 5% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 3924.968 versus 3728.135
- Environ 29% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 175.219 versus 136.223
- Environ 21% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1226.861 versus 1011.233
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1200 MHz versus 1005 MHz |
| Pipelines | 4096 versus 2304 |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 16 GB versus 8 GB |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1890 MHz versus 1625 MHz (13000 MHz effective) |
| Référence | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3924.968 versus 3728.135 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 175.219 versus 136.223 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1226.861 versus 1011.233 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000
GPU 2: AMD Radeon PRO WX 9100
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 | AMD Radeon PRO WX 9100 |
|---|---|---|
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 85799 | 65451 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 232.933 | 174.714 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3728.135 | 3924.968 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 24.872 | 17.305 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 136.223 | 175.219 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1011.233 | 1226.861 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20206 | 13848 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3714 | 3680 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 | 3336 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20206 | 13848 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3714 | 3680 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 | 3336 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 7856 | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 12361 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 724 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 | AMD Radeon PRO WX 9100 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Turing | GCN 5.0 |
| Nom de code | TU104 | Vega 10 |
| Génération GCN | Quadro RTX | |
| Date de sortie | 13 November 2018 | 10 July 2017 |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $899 | $1,599 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 207 | 209 |
| Genre | Desktop | Workstation |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1545 MHz | 1500 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1005 MHz | 1200 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 12 nm | 14 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 222.5 GFLOPS | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 14.24 TFLOPS | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 7.119 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 2304 | 4096 |
| Pixel fill rate | 98.88 GPixel/s | |
| Render output units | 64 | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 222.5 GTexel/s | 384.0 GTexel / s |
| Texture Units | 144 | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 160 Watt | 230 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 13600 million | 12,500 million |
| Performance á point flottant | 12,288 gflops | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C | 6x mini-DisplayPort |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Longeur | 9.5 inches (241 mm) | 267 mm |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 8-pin | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 8 GB | 16 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 416.0 GB/s | 483.8 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 bit | 2048 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1625 MHz (13000 MHz effective) | 1890 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 | HBM2 |
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 avec des autres
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 4000 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop)
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 4000 vs
AMDRadeon Vega Frontier Edition
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 4000 vs
AMDRadeon PRO WX 9100
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 4000 vs
AMDRadeon RX 5600 XT
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 4000 vs
AMDRadeon 780M
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 4000 vs
AMDRadeon RX 6550M
