NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 vs AMD Radeon R9 390 X2
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 and AMD Radeon R9 390 X2 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- Around 1% higher core clock speed: 1005 MHz vs 1000 MHz
- 103x more texture fill rate: 222.5 GTexel/s vs 2x 160.0 GTexel / s billion / sec
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 28 nm
- 3.6x lower typical power consumption: 160 Watt vs 580 Watt
- Around 17% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 24.719 vs 21.128
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 13 November 2018 vs 3 September 2015 |
Core clock speed | 1005 MHz vs 1000 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 222.5 GTexel/s vs 2x 160.0 GTexel / s billion / sec |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 160 Watt vs 580 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 24.719 vs 21.128 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 390 X2
- 2.2x more pipelines: 2x 2560 vs 2304
- 2x more maximum memory size: 2x 8 GB vs 8 GB
- 3.3x more memory clock speed: 5400 MHz vs 1625 MHz (13000 MHz effective)
Pipelines | 2x 2560 vs 2304 |
Maximum memory size | 2x 8 GB vs 8 GB |
Memory clock speed | 5400 MHz vs 1625 MHz (13000 MHz effective) |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 390 X2
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 | AMD Radeon R9 390 X2 |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 85558 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 282.628 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3403.106 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 24.719 | 21.128 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 136.919 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1010.818 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20206 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3714 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20206 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3714 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 7856 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 | AMD Radeon R9 390 X2 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Turing | GCN 2.0 |
Code name | TU104 | Grenada |
GCN generation | Quadro RTX | |
Launch date | 13 November 2018 | 3 September 2015 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $899 | $1,399 |
Place in performance rating | 195 | 246 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1545 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 1005 MHz | 1000 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 28 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 222.5 GFLOPS | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 14.24 TFLOPS | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 7.119 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 2304 | 2x 2560 |
Pixel fill rate | 98.88 GPixel/s | |
Render output units | 64 | |
Texture fill rate | 222.5 GTexel/s | 2x 160.0 GTexel / s billion / sec |
Texture Units | 144 | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 160 Watt | 580 Watt |
Transistor count | 13600 million | 6,200 million |
Floating-point performance | 2x 5,120 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 9.5 inches (241 mm) | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | 4x 8-pin |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (12_0) |
OpenCL | 1.2 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 6.4 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 2x 8 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 416.0 GB/s | 2x 345.6 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 bit | 2x 512 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1625 MHz (13000 MHz effective) | 5400 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |