NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q vs AMD Radeon Pro Duo

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q and AMD Radeon Pro Duo videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q

AMD Radeon Pro Duo

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q

Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 1 month(s) later
Around 35% higher boost clock speed: 1350 MHz vs 1000 MHz
114.9x more texture fill rate: 259.2 GTexel/s vs 2x 256.0 GTexel / s billion / sec
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 28 nm
4.4x lower typical power consumption: 80 Watt vs 350 Watt
2x more maximum memory size: 16 GB vs 8 GB
Around 68% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 13640 vs 8137
Around 54% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 83044 vs 53806
Around 91% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 19377 vs 10141
Around 91% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 19377 vs 10141

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	27 May 2019 vs 26 April 2016
Boost clock speed	1350 MHz vs 1000 MHz
Texture fill rate	259.2 GTexel/s vs 2x 256.0 GTexel / s billion / sec
Manufacturing process technology	12 nm vs 28 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	80 Watt vs 350 Watt
Maximum memory size	16 GB vs 8 GB
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	13640 vs 8137
Geekbench - OpenCL	83044 vs 53806
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	19377 vs 10141
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3717 vs 3713
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	19377 vs 10141
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3717 vs 3713

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro Duo

2.7x more pipelines: 2x 4096 vs 3072
Around 28% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 745 vs 584
11.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 38251 vs 3357
11.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 38251 vs 3357

Specifications (specs)
Pipelines	2x 4096 vs 3072
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark	745 vs 584
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	38251 vs 3357
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	38251 vs 3357

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Pro Duo

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

13640

8137

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

584

745

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

83044

53806

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

19377

10141

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3717

3713

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3357

38251

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

19377

10141

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3717

3713

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3357

38251

Name	NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q	AMD Radeon Pro Duo
PassMark - G3D Mark	13640	8137
PassMark - G2D Mark	584	745
Geekbench - OpenCL	83044	53806
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	19377	10141
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3717	3713
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3357	38251
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	19377	10141
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3717	3713
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3357	38251
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	7879	0
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)		141.474
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)		3621.344
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)		13.132
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)		112.973
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)		799.933

Compare specifications (specs)

	NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q	AMD Radeon Pro Duo
Essentials
Architecture	Turing	GCN 3.0
Code name	TU104	Capsaicin
Launch date	27 May 2019	26 April 2016
Place in performance rating	169	188
Type	Laptop	Workstation
Design		reference
Launch price (MSRP)		$1,499
Price now		$849
Value for money (0-100)		17.05
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1350 MHz	1000 MHz
Core clock speed	600 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	12 nm	28 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance	259.2 GFLOPS
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance	16.59 TFLOPS
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance	8.294 TFLOPS
Pipelines	3072	2x 4096
Pixel fill rate	86.40 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate	259.2 GTexel/s	2x 256.0 GTexel / s billion / sec
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	80 Watt	350 Watt
Transistor count	13600 million	8,900 million
Compute units		128
Floating-point performance		2x 8,192 gflops
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
DisplayPort support
Eyefinity
HDMI
Number of Eyefinity displays		6
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	None	3x 8-pin
Width	IGP
Bus support		PCIe 3.0
Length		277 mm
API support
OpenCL	1.2	2.0
OpenGL	4.6	4.5
Shader Model	6.4
Vulkan
DirectX		DirectX® 12
Mantle
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	16 GB	8 GB
Memory bandwidth		512 GB / s
Memory bus width		2x 4096 Bit
Memory clock speed		500 MHz
Memory type		High Bandwidth Memory (HBM)
Technologies
AppAcceleration
CrossFire
Enduro
FreeSync
FRTC
HD3D
LiquidVR
PowerTune
TressFX
TrueAudio
Unified Video Decoder (UVD)
Video Code Engine (VCE)
ZeroCore