NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 month(s) later
- Around 50% lower typical power consumption: 80 Watt vs 120 Watt
- Around 5% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 13640 vs 12931
- Around 35% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 83044 vs 61407
- Around 14% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 19377 vs 16952
- Around 14% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 19377 vs 16952
- Around 26% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 7879 vs 6260
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 27 May 2019 vs 22 February 2019 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 80 Watt vs 120 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 13640 vs 12931 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 83044 vs 61407 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 19377 vs 16952 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 vs 3355 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 19377 vs 16952 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 vs 3355 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 7879 vs 6260 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
- 2.5x more core clock speed: 1500 MHz vs 600 MHz
- Around 31% higher boost clock speed: 1770 MHz vs 1350 MHz
- Around 39% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 813 vs 584
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1500 MHz vs 600 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1770 MHz vs 1350 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 813 vs 584 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 vs 3717 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 vs 3717 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 13640 | 12931 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 584 | 813 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 83044 | 61407 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 19377 | 16952 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 | 3718 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 | 3355 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 19377 | 16952 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 | 3718 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 | 3355 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 7879 | 6260 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 208.608 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2573.643 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 16.447 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 145.886 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 926.614 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Turing | Turing |
| Code name | TU104 | TU116 |
| Launch date | 27 May 2019 | 22 February 2019 |
| Place in performance rating | 169 | 200 |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $279 | |
| Price now | $279.99 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 67.32 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1350 MHz | 1770 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 600 MHz | 1500 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 12 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 259.2 GFLOPS | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 16.59 TFLOPS | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 8.294 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 3072 | |
| Pixel fill rate | 86.40 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 259.2 GTexel/s | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 80 Watt | 120 Watt |
| Transistor count | 13600 million | 6,600 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| DisplayPort count | 1 | |
| DisplayPort support | ||
| HDMI | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 8-pin |
| Width | IGP | |
| Length | 229 mm | |
API support |
||
| OpenCL | 1.2 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | |
| Vulkan | ||
| DirectX | 12.0 | |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 16 GB | |
| Memory clock speed | 12000 MHz | |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q with others
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 5000 Max-Q vs
AMDRadeon RX Vega 64
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 5000 Max-Q vs
AMDRadeon Pro Vega 64X
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 5000 Max-Q vs
AMDRadeon Pro Vega II
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 5000 Max-Q vs
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 4000 Mobile
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 5000 Max-Q vs
NVIDIARTX A3000 Mobile
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 5000 Max-Q vs
NVIDIACMP 40HX
