NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 3 mois plus tard
- Environ 50% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 80 Watt versus 120 Watt
- Environ 5% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 13640 versus 12931
- Environ 35% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 83044 versus 61445
- Environ 14% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 19377 versus 16952
- Environ 14% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 19377 versus 16952
- Environ 26% meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 7879 versus 6261
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 27 May 2019 versus 22 February 2019 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 80 Watt versus 120 Watt |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 13640 versus 12931 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 83044 versus 61445 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 19377 versus 16952 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 versus 3355 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 19377 versus 16952 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 versus 3355 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 7879 versus 6261 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
- 2.5x plus de vitesse du noyau: 1500 MHz versus 600 MHz
- Environ 31% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1770 MHz versus 1350 MHz
- Environ 39% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 813 versus 584
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1500 MHz versus 600 MHz |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1770 MHz versus 1350 MHz |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 813 versus 584 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 versus 3717 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 versus 3717 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 13640 | 12931 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 584 | 813 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 83044 | 61445 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 19377 | 16952 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 | 3718 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 | 3355 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 19377 | 16952 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 | 3718 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 | 3355 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 7879 | 6261 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 208.608 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2573.643 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 16.447 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 145.886 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 926.614 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Turing | Turing |
| Nom de code | TU104 | TU116 |
| Date de sortie | 27 May 2019 | 22 February 2019 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 169 | 200 |
| Genre | Laptop | Desktop |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $279 | |
| Prix maintenant | $279.99 | |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 67.32 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1350 MHz | 1770 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 600 MHz | 1500 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 12 nm | 12 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 259.2 GFLOPS | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 16.59 TFLOPS | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 8.294 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 3072 | |
| Pixel fill rate | 86.40 GPixel/s | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 259.2 GTexel/s | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 80 Watt | 120 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 13600 million | 6,600 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| Compte DisplayPort | 1 | |
| Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
| HDMI | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | 1x 8-pin |
| Largeur | IGP | |
| Longeur | 229 mm | |
Soutien API |
||
| OpenCL | 1.2 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | |
| Vulkan | ||
| DirectX | 12.0 | |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 16 GB | |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 12000 MHz | |
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q avec des autres
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 5000 Max-Q vs
AMDRadeon RX Vega 64
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 5000 Max-Q vs
AMDRadeon Pro Vega 64X
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 5000 Max-Q vs
AMDRadeon Pro Vega II
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 5000 Max-Q vs
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 4000 Mobile
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 5000 Max-Q vs
NVIDIARTX A3000 Mobile
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 5000 Max-Q vs
NVIDIACMP 40HX
