NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q vs NVIDIA Quadro P4200 Mobile
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q and NVIDIA Quadro P4200 Mobile videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 3 month(s) later
- 1886.5x more texture fill rate: 259.2 GTexel/s vs 137.4 GTexel / s
- Around 71% higher pipelines: 3072 vs 1792
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 16 nm
- Around 25% lower typical power consumption: 80 Watt vs 100 Watt
- 2x more maximum memory size: 16 GB vs 8 GB
- Around 29% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 13640 vs 10579
- Around 11% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 584 vs 525
- 2.4x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 83044 vs 34875
- Around 19% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 19377 vs 16345
- 32.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3357 vs 103
- Around 19% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 19377 vs 16345
- 32.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3357 vs 103
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 27 May 2019 vs 21 February 2018 |
| Texture fill rate | 259.2 GTexel/s vs 137.4 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 3072 vs 1792 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 16 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 80 Watt vs 100 Watt |
| Maximum memory size | 16 GB vs 8 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 13640 vs 10579 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 584 vs 525 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 83044 vs 34875 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 19377 vs 16345 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 vs 3714 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 vs 103 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 19377 vs 16345 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 vs 3714 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 vs 103 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P4200 Mobile
- 2x more core clock speed: 1227 MHz vs 600 MHz
- Around 22% higher boost clock speed: 1647 MHz vs 1350 MHz
| Core clock speed | 1227 MHz vs 600 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1647 MHz vs 1350 MHz |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro P4200 Mobile
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q | NVIDIA Quadro P4200 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 13640 | 10579 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 584 | 525 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 83044 | 34875 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 19377 | 16345 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 | 3714 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 | 103 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 19377 | 16345 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 | 3714 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 | 103 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 7879 | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q | NVIDIA Quadro P4200 Mobile | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Turing | Pascal |
| Code name | TU104 | GP104 |
| Launch date | 27 May 2019 | 21 February 2018 |
| Place in performance rating | 169 | 286 |
| Type | Laptop | Mobile workstation |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1350 MHz | 1647 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 600 MHz | 1227 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 16 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 259.2 GFLOPS | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 16.59 TFLOPS | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 8.294 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 3072 | 1792 |
| Pixel fill rate | 86.40 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 259.2 GTexel/s | 137.4 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 80 Watt | 100 Watt |
| Transistor count | 13600 million | 7,200 million |
| Floating-point performance | 4,398 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | 3.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Width | IGP | |
API support |
||
| OpenCL | 1.2 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | |
| Vulkan | ||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 16 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 192.3 GB / s | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 6008 MHz | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q with others
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 5000 Max-Q vs
AMDRadeon RX Vega 64
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 5000 Max-Q vs
AMDRadeon Pro Vega 64X
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 5000 Max-Q vs
AMDRadeon Pro Vega II
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 5000 Max-Q vs
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 4000 Mobile
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 5000 Max-Q vs
NVIDIARTX A3000 Mobile
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 5000 Max-Q vs
NVIDIACMP 40HX
